Hmmm... I think I skipped that lab by mistake. I was trying to figure out what I had done but I couldn't find my final configs. Anyways, I thought authentication was configured on a per interface basis and not per pvc. If each pvc need to be authenticated then they better be assigned to diff interface but I guess I'm wrong.
The task states "Secure these PVC's using CHAP authentication. This would have led me to configure PPP over frame relay on the interfaces configured on the previous task. I would never have thought about configuring authentication per PVC on each PVC configured on the same interface (hope I that makes sense). I'll do more research tonight on this because if there is a way to do authentication at the pvc level I don't know how to do it YET and I want to make sure I'm ready for that. On Mar 24, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Marko Milivojevic wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 15:17, Mark Beynon <[email protected]> wrote: >> I know how I have done it, but haven't completed the lab yet so don't know >> whether it's right. What I can say is yes you can do per PVC, > > Mark - I'm sure you're doing it right if you figured how to do it > per-PVC. I think Rogelio had another approach in mind. I will say no > more here :-). > > It would be interesting to hear back from you Rogelio about what > solution you had in mind. You know, there IS always another way of > solving questions. I just wonder if there is something you came up > with here that would impress us as the unintended solution. I always > love to see those! > > -- > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427 > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert > > YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack > time with our Blended Learning Solution! > > Mailto: [email protected] > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 > Fax: +1.810.454.0130 > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/ _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
