Carlos,

I don't understand what you are asking. I thought wanted the number of
prefixes received by one PE from another. What are you exactly looking for?

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can somebody help me with this question?  (see below)
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- On *Sat, 3/6/10, Carlos Valero <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Carlos Valero <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS Question: How to verify the number of
> Prefixes?
> To: "Bryan Bartik" <[email protected]>
>
> Cc: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>, "ccie_rs" <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, March 6, 2010, 9:36 AM
>
>
> Thank you.  That's what I thought.
>
> However, my confusion comes from this.
> If I issue this command for a specific VRF instead of a Summary:*
>
> show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf Customer_A*
>
> BGP table version is 40, local router ID is 10.10.10.4
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
>    Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> Route Distinguisher: 100:101 (default for vrf Customer_A)
> *>i200.0.6.0        10.10.10.6               0    100      0 ?
> *> 200.0.4.0        0.0.0.0                  0         32768 ?
> *>i200.1.6.0        10.10.10.6               0    100      0 ?
>
>
> As you see, the Prefixes in this result are under the "Route Distinguisher"
> column
>
> This is confusing me.  Are these Prefixes or are they "Route
> Distinguishers"
>
> Are they same?  If so, then why?
>
> Sorry for this "silly" question, but MPLS hasn't totally clicked in my mind
> yet.
>
> I hope you can clarify this for me.
>
> Thank you!
>
>
> --- On *Sat, 3/6/10, Bryan Bartik <[email protected]>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Bryan Bartik <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] MPLS Question: How to verify the number of
> Prefixes?
> To: "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>, "ccie_rs" <
> [email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, March 6, 2010, 12:20 AM
>
> Carlos:
>
> show ip bgp vpnv4 all summary should do it.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Simple MPLS question:
>>
>> What is the quickest/simplest way to determine the exact number of
>> Prefixes received by a PE Router from another PE Router over an MP-BGP
>> session?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for your answer!
>>
>>
>> --- On *Wed, 3/3/10, Joe Astorino <[email protected]>* wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Want to know how to calculate the EIGRP
>> metric?
>> To: "Dale Shaw" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "ccie_rs" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 7:13 PM
>>
>> Yeah...I probably should not have included that check since it does not
>> play into the calculation. <shrug>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Dale Shaw 
>> <[email protected]<http://mc/compose?to=dale.shaw%[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Joe Astorino 
>>> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Dale,
>>> >
>>> > The bandwidth that is set on R7 s0/0/0 is completely irrelevant to the
>>> > calculation.
>>>
>>> Yes, this is the point I've been trying to make, subtly, but failing :-)
>>>
>>> In the second terminal output box in your article, you are checking
>>> R7's s0/0/0 interface, but the bandwidth and delay values specified
>>> there are irrelevant.
>>>
>>> Nice article, but if I could give one piece of feedback it would be to
>>> make it painfully clear that the composite metric is calculated
>>> "uni-directionally" -- from the device performing the calculation, to
>>> the ultimate destination -- using the egress interfaces *only*,
>>> including the ultimate directly connected interface, in each hop along
>>> the path.  (in this case, R8's s0/0/0 and R7's lo0.)
>>>
>>> I've found this fact to result in a 'light bulb moment' for lots of
>>> people struggling with EIGRP metric calculation.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dale
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S)
>> Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>> Mailto: [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA
>> (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security &
>> Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the
>> United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online
>> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
>> www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707 (R&S, SP), CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to