access-list 101 permit permit ip any any
!
route-map go.die
  match ip addr 101
  set int null 0
! 
ip local policy route-map go.die

That will kill all ip traffic sourced by the router itself.



From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:01:11 -0400
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Block traffic generate by our own router.



Hello, 
  
Could someone please help, 
  
I have an acl outbound on the router interface to block traffic generate by
this router.  However, no traffic match to acl. 
  
Thanks, 
  
Nhan



  



Windows Live? Photos: it's easy to store and manage your photos online. See
how.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live? SkyDrive?: Get 25 GB of free online storage.
http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090714/21b2ffe4/a
ttachment-0001.htm 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:22:27 -0400
From: Larry Hadrava <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] proctor labs vouchers limbo
To: [email protected], support <[email protected]>,  Neil
        Apolzan <[email protected]>,        Wayne Lawson
        <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Eric:
Have you sent an email to Proctor Labs Support?
I've copied them on this email as well.

Thanks
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com


On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Eric Stanfield
<[email protected]>wrote:

> If anyone is on from proctor labs, I bought 10 sessions Friday and still
> haven't received voucher codes.  Need to get some rack time in tomorrow
> morning, so please shoot me a note.  Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090714/aded0419/a
ttachment-0001.htm 

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:26:27 +0000
From: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Block traffic generate by our own router.
To: "Nhan Duong" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected],    "CCIE OSL"
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        
<1855396617-1247595982-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1691093...@b
xe1173.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

Nhan, 

You need to implement control plane policing to stop router generated
traffic


------Original Message------
From: Nhan Duong
Sender: [email protected]
To: CCIE OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS]  Block traffic generate by our own router.
Sent: Jul 10, 2009 5:01 PM

Hello, 
? 
Could someone please help, 
? 
I have an acl outbound on the router interface to block traffic generate by
this router.? However, no traffic match to acl. 
? 
Thanks, 
? 
Nhan



? 


----------------
Windows Live? Photos: it's easy to store and manage your photos online. See
how. _______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com



Regards,

Joe Astorino 
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
 

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:27:20 +0000
From: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPExpert Volume 3 Lab 1 Task 1.1 -
        VTPserver/client question
To: "jmangawang" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected],    "CCIE OSL"
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        
<744317928-1247596036-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-12662047...@b
xe1173.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

Make sure you are running vtp version 2


------Original Message------
From: jmangawang
Sender: [email protected]
To: CCIE OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPExpert Volume 3 Lab 1 Task 1.1 - VTPserver/client
question
Sent: Jul 13, 2009 11:59 AM

The first part of this task asks me to configure Cat1 as VTP server,
and others as clients.  But then it says "On Cat1 and Cat2, 'show vtp
status' should show the loopback1 interface as the local updater ID,
and as the preferred interface."  My solution was to configure Cat1
and Cat2 as VTP servers, and both with the command "vtp interface lo1"
set.  I could verify this easily by doing a show vtp status and
visually seeing Loopback1 as the preferred interface on both.  But the
PG's solution (and graded lab script, too) says to configure Cat2 as a
client.  But when you do a show vtp status on Cat2 as a client, it
doesn't show anything about Loopback1 in the output, as suggested by
the task requirement.

Is it not safe to say that a VTP server is both a server and a client?
 In terms of getting VLAN updates, it functions identically to a
client, in that the server making the update must have a newer version
than the clients or other servers.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com


Regards,

Joe Astorino 
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
 

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:28:34 +0000
From: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] ? to all
To: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected],    "'Larry Hadrava'"
        <[email protected]>
Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        
<1519603471-1247596108-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1829682617-@
bxe1173.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

Just photo I'd Ed.  I personally took the advice of Jared and brought my own
Redbull stash : )

Best of luck!


Regards,

Joe Astorino 
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Bodnar, Edward" <[email protected]>

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:10:35 
To: 'Larry Hadrava'<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] ? to all


_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:46:45 +0000
From: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 2 Lab 8 Task 2.2
To: "Rob Routt" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected],    "CCIE OSL"
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        
<1690400057-1247597198-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1354379784-@
bxe1173.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"

MFR. It is a known typo.


------Original Message------
From: Rob Routt
Sender: [email protected]
To: CCIE OSL
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 2 Lab 8 Task 2.2
Sent: Jul 11, 2009 12:16 PM

While doing this lab, I have noticed more errors than normal and would some
clarification on this specific task. 2.2 states configure serial interfaces
between R6 And R9 (they are connected with two serial interfaces s0/2/0-1)
Use dlci 609 and 906 respectively. To me, this means mfr or frf.16, but the
solution is multilink bundle. Is this just a?typo with ppp multilink as the
solution instead of MFR? If so, which is correct? 
? 
-Rob Routt
 _______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com



Regards,

Joe Astorino 
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
 

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 18:51:12 +0000
From: RONALDO NASCIMENTO <[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS]  Multicast task 17.3, ttl scope
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


Hi, perhaps someone already answered this, but why "10" was chosen for the
ttl scope?

 

(...)

task 17.3:

ip pim send-rp-announce lo0 scope 10 group-list 6
(...)

 


Ronaldo 


_________________________________________________________________
Drag n? drop?Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live? Photos.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090714/44be3ade/a
ttachment-0001.htm 

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:15:29 +0000
From: RONALDO NASCIMENTO <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] please help in understanding multicast
To: <[email protected]>,
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"


Hi, 

 

My understanding is that the DR election takes place only because you may
have multiple routers on a given network (i.e., LAN) so one needs to be
elected, a DR,  in order to send/receive IGMP report messages to RP and
minimize traffic that way. 

 

The Mapping Agent (MA) learns and build tables showing respective group
address and RP address. It sends a multicast message "RP-Discovery" to
224.0.1.40 group and from there routers can learn which are the RP's for the
respective group.

 


Ronaldo Nascimento

 



 



From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:20:08 +0000
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] please help in understanding multicast






Hi,
I need help in understanding  IP multicasting specially sparse mode.... bit
confused 
In sparse mode we have  a RP and Maping Agent (MA).  RP announces its self
to MA and MA receives the request from clients to join a specific multicast
group for which RP is configured  or MA announcing. Source send the source
active message to the RP for multicast group it has. Now my question is that
whats the function of PIM DR how it works I just know that PIM DR is elected
on the  bases of higher priority or the higher IP Address. 
how PIM DR works in relation with  RP or MA
If I am not wrong  Source sends unicast packets to PIM DR for specific group
then DR sends those packets to RP and then RP register itself with DR. if
its right then  its mean Source dosent communicate with RP ??
Please someone help
 
Thanks




Windows Live? Photos: it's easy to store and manage your photos online. See
how.
_________________________________________________________________
Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites. 
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090714/4cdf23b0/a
ttachment.htm 

End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 81
***************************************

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to