More questions about Multicast.

I have note received any answers to the previous ones.
I hope somebody helps with those as well.

In any case, this is what I understand about ip pim autorp listener
(of course all this applies to Auto-RP only)

- Both, RP(s) and Mapping Agent are in Sparse Mode;
  ip pim sparse

- All other (participant) Routers require Sparse-Dense: 
  ip pim sparse-dense-mode

- As an alternative, Leaf Routers may use:
  ip pim autorp listener

This allows ONLY groups 224.0.1.39 & 224.0.1.40 to operate in Dense Mode.
Everything else will operate in Sparse Mode!

If this is correct, 
then the RP(s) and Mapping Agent will NOT need ip pim autorp listener

Now in this Task, R2 should announce itself as the RP

But in the solution you do configure ip pim autorp listener  in R2!!

Why?

I checked the final config and in fact ip pim autorp listener  is there.

So I guess either the solution is wrong or all my previous logic is wrong.
It is one or the other!

Could you please clarify?


Thank you!



--- On Sat, 7/11/09, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Carlos Valero <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3, Lab 6, Task 5.2 (Multicast)
To: "prakash patel" <[email protected]>, [email protected], 
[email protected], "Jared Scrivener" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, July 11, 2009, 5:17 PM

Sorry, but I have another question about Multicast

In Task 5.2 of this Lab (Vol 3, lab 6) the requirements state:

"Multicast Traffic should distributed exclusively on Shared Trees"


In the solution, BIDIR is enabled in all participating Routers:

- ip pim bidir-enable 

But I'm not sure why.

What part of these requirements "forces" us to use ip pim bidir-enable ?

I guess it is not the fact we are using Shared Trees, right?

I believe that we can have Sparse Mode using Unidirectional Shared Trees, 
correct?

So is it the fact that
 says: "exclusively on Shared Trees" what makes us use BIDIR?

Could you please explain?


Thank you!!


--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Jared Scrivener <[email protected]> wrote:


 

Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:16:45 -0400

From: [email protected]

To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3, Lab 2, Task 5.1 (Multicast)



OK, seems like I jumped in a little prematurely here. The ACL is fine and the 
priority doesn’t need swapping in your solution below, Carlos (but your 
question has a typo). Anyhow, the Solution Guide is being updated correctly and 
will be in the members section on our next update cycle.



Cheers,



Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP

Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.810.454.0130

Mailto: [email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> 





From: Jared Scrivener <[email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> >

Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:12:48 -0400

To: Carlos Valero <[email protected] <http://yahoo.com/> >, 
<[email protected] <http://onlinestudylist.com/> >, Joe Astorino 
<[email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> >

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3, Lab 2, Task 5.1 (Multicast)



The ACL is fine. The priority value should be swapped so that it uses 10 on R2 
and 20 on R7. This is just another lesson in how CCIE’s can make typo’s. I’m 
fixing it up in our Proctor Guide now.



Cheers,



Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP

Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/> 

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Fax: +1.810.454.0130

Mailto: [email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> 





From: Carlos Valero <[email protected] <http://yahoo.com/> >

Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:19:29 -0700 (PDT)

To: <[email protected] <http://onlinestudylist.com/> >, Joe Astorino 
<[email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> >

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3, Lab 2, Task 5.1 (Multicast)



Made a little mistake on the requirements section.

The second part should be like this:



Configure R7 to announce candidacy as an RP for Groups:

- First octet = 225 or 227  

- Second octet less than 128  

- Priority = 20



Originally I wrote Priority = 10



But the solution it is being configured with Priority = 10



- ip pim rp-candidate  l1  group-list 51 prio 10



That's exactly the source of my confusion.



Why is R7 configuration based on R2's requirements and vice-versa?





--- On Thu, 7/9/09, Carlos Valero <[email protected] <http://yahoo.com/> > 
wrote:



From: Carlos Valero <[email protected] <http://yahoo.com/> >

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol 3, Lab 2, Task 5.1 (Multicast)

To: [email protected] <http://onlinestudylist.com/> , "Joe Astorino" 
<[email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> >

Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 7:26 PM



Hello,



I think I need some help with this task.

It seems to be quite simple, but to me the solution seems to be backwards and 
I'm very confused and stock!



Requirements:



Configure R2 to announce candidacy as an RP for Groups:

- First octet = 225 or 227  

- Priority = 10



Configure R7 to announce candidacy as an RP for Groups:

- First octet = 225 or 227  

- Second octet less than 128  

- Priority = 10



Solution:



R2:



access-list 51 permit 225.0.0.0  0.255.255.255

access-list 51 permit 227.0.0.0  0.255.255.255



ip pim rp-candidate  l1  group-list 51 prio 20

ip pim bsr-candidate l1



R7:



access-list 51 permit 225.0.0.0  0.127.255.255

access-list 51 permit 227.0.0.0  0.127.255.255

access-list 51 permit 225.0.0.0  0.127.255.255

access-list 51 permit 227.0.0.0  0.127.255.255



ip pim rp-candidate  l1  group-list 51 prio 10

ip pim bsr-candidate l1



This seems to be backwards to me!



That is, the requirements state that R2 should have a Priority = 10 and

R7  should have a Priority = 20



But it is configured backwards!  R2 = 20  and  R7 = 10!



Needless to say, the ACL also seem to be backwards to me!



Obviously, there is something that I'm missing here.

And frankly I don't know what it is.



I hope somebody can help.



Did I mention that Multicast is my less favorite topic?

Actually I should say that I almost hate it :-(

















--- On Wed, 7/8/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected] <http://ipexpert.com/> 
> wrote:







 



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----



_______________________________________________

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com





_______________________________________________

For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com





Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.  See how. 
<http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd_062009>
 


 



      


      
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to