Team,
Could someone comment on this please?
I am surprised here with the behaviour of R2 when advertising routes to R4.
Can someone see something I am missing here?
This is the RT at R4. The serial link between R2 and R5 and the ethernet link
between R2 and R1 should not show up in the RT of R4.
172.31.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 2 masks
C 172.31.40.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
C 172.31.24.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0/0/0
R 172.31.12.0/24 [120/1] via 172.31.24.2, 00:00:25, Serial0/0/0
! Link to R1
R 172.31.100.0/29 [120/1] via 172.31.24.2, 00:00:25, Serial0/0/0
! Link to R5
210.4.4.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 210.4.4.4 is directly connected, Loopback0
R4#
Snapshot of R2 config:
R2
router rip
version 2
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Serial0/1/0.24
network 172.31.0.0
no auto-summary
------------------------shortened ----------------------------
snapshot of R4 config
R4
router rip
version 2
network 172.31.0.0
no auto-summary
Thanks
Bauke
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo!
Answers.
__________________________________________________________________
Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot
with the All-new Yahoo! Mail. Click on Options in Mail and switch to New Mail
today or register for free at http://mail.yahoo.ca_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
