Rich,
I think you should use "and" in this case, take a look:
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 150.19.42.2 255.255.255.0
vrrp 19 ip 150.19.42.1
vrrp 19 track 3 decrement 20
track 1 ip route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 reachability
track 2 ip route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 metric threshold
threshold metric up 20 down 21
track 3 list boolean and
object 1
object 2
R2#sh trac
Track 1
IP route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 reachability
Reachability is Up (OSPF)
1 change, last change 00:22:34
First-hop interface is Tunnel0
Tracked by:
Track-list 3
Track 2
IP route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 metric threshold
Metric threshold is Up (OSPF/20/20)
1 change, last change 00:21:35
Metric threshold down 21 up 20
First-hop interface is Tunnel0
Tracked by:
Track-list 3
Track 3
List boolean and
Boolean AND is Up
2 changes, last change 00:16:13
object 1 Up
object 2 Up
Tracked by:
VRRP FastEthernet0/0 19
R2#sh vrrp brief
Interface Grp Pri Time Own Pre State Master addr Group addr
Fa0/0 19 100 3609 Y Master 150.19.42.2 150.19.42.1
R2#sir 150.19.123.0
Routing entry for 150.19.123.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20
Tag 2, type extern 2, forward metric 32
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Advertised by eigrp 100 route-map from-ospf
Last update from 150.19.1.1 on Tunnel0, 00:04:12 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 150.19.1.1, from 150.19.1.1, 00:04:12 ago, via Tunnel0
Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1
Route tag 2
R1(config)#router ospf 1
R1(config-router)# redistribute rip subnets route-map from-rip metric-type 1
R2#sir 150.19.123.0
Routing entry for 150.19.123.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 52
Tag 2, type extern 1
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Advertised by eigrp 100 route-map from-ospf
Last update from 150.19.1.1 on Tunnel0, 00:00:03 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 150.19.1.1, from 150.19.1.1, 00:00:03 ago, via Tunnel0
Route metric is 52, traffic share count is 1
Route tag 2
*Mar 3 02:25:27.155: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 2 ip route 150.19.123.0/24 metric
threshold Up->Down
*Mar 3 02:25:27.791: %TRACKING-5-STATE: 3 list boolean and Up->Down
R2#sh track
Track 1
IP route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 reachability
Reachability is Up (OSPF)
1 change, last change 00:24:54
First-hop interface is Tunnel0
Tracked by:
Track-list 3
Track 2
IP route 150.19.123.0 255.255.255.0 metric threshold
Metric threshold is Down (OSPF/52/52)
2 changes, last change 00:00:01
Metric threshold down 21 up 20
First-hop interface is Tunnel0
Tracked by:
Track-list 3
Track 3
List boolean and
Boolean AND is Down
3 changes, last change 00:00:01
object 1 Up
object 2 Down
Tracked by:
VRRP FastEthernet0/0 19
R2#sh vrrp brief
Interface Grp Pri Time Own Pre State Master addr Group addr
Fa0/0 19 80 3609 Y Backup 150.19.42.4 150.19.42.1
Regards,
Adonys
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:15:54 -0400
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object Tracking
This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and “If
R5 loses the route to 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be
preferred
gateway.” I configured the following:
IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0
Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24
Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65
track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24
reachability
track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric
threshold
threshold metric up 65 down 66
track 100 list boolean or
object 1
object 2
int fa0/0
vrrp 1 priority 150
vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75
The PG did not use the track 100 list boolean or option. I’m
still a bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or
boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered
correct or not?
Thanks,
Rich
--
Regards,
Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
