If you have the RP that you wish to be primary announce a more specific group (ie: 239.255.0.1/32). The Backup RP can then announce less specific group (239.255.0.0/30). I believe this is a workaround for not having priority feature such as BSR does. I tried this out and it appeared to work but if someone has a better method please post.
Michael Griego Michael Griego, CCNP Sr. Network Engineer, [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 7:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 21 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: General multicast question (prakash patel) 2. Re: General multicast question (Kim Pedersen) 3. Re: General multicast question (Robert S Wyzykowski) 4. Re: TEST QOS (Stan) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:38:25 -0400 From: prakash patel <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Cisco Announce group. The Mapping Agents serve as the Rendezvous Point election agency by listening to the Cisco Announce group to receive Candidate-RP Announcements, selecting the highest IP address Candidate-RP for a group range and then multicast the election results to the 224.0.1.40 Cisco Discovery group. All Cisco routers in the network automatically join the 224.0.1.40 group so that they can learn the IP address of the elected Rendezvous Point for each group range. From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:34:36 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question I know in BSR we have the priority option. What is the similar option for auto-rp? From: Robert S Wyzykowski [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:31 AM AST To: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question When using auto-rp... If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping agent decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria for the election process? Thanks. From: Joe Astorino [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST To: "Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object Tracking This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and ?If R5 loses the route to 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred gateway.? I configured the following: IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 reachability track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric threshold threshold metric up 65 down 66 track 100 list boolean or object 1 object 2 int fa0/0 vrrp 1 priority 150 vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 The PG did not use the track 100 list boolean or option. I?m still a bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered correct or not? Thanks, Rich -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live? SkyDrive?: Get 25 GB of free online storage. http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090704/76170240/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:39:53 +0200 From: Kim Pedersen <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question To: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Hi, I believe its the highest IP. Kim Robert S Wyzykowski wrote: > > I know in BSR we have the priority option. What is the similar option > for auto-rp? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * From: *Robert S Wyzykowski [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/04/2009 10:31 AM AST > * To: *"Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> > * Cc: *CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > * Subject: *[OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question > > > When using auto-rp... > > If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping > agent decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria > for the election process? > > Thanks. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * From: *Joe Astorino [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST > * To: *"Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> > * Cc: *CCIE OSL <[email protected]> > * Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object > Tracking > > > This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and ?If R5 loses the route to > 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred > gateway.? I configured the following: > > > > IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 > > Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 <http://172.30.21.0/24> > > Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 > > > > track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 <http://172.30.21.0/24> reachability > > track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 <http://172.30.21.0/24> metric > threshold > > threshold metric up 65 down 66 > > track 100 list boolean or > > object 1 > > object 2 > > > > int fa0/0 > > vrrp 1 priority 150 > > vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 > > > > The PG did not use the* track 100 list boolean or* option. I?m > still a bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using > the and/or boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration > would be considered correct or not? > > > > Thanks, > > Rich > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Joe Astorino > CCIE #24347 (R&S) > Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > -- // Freedom Matters // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:43:18 -0400 From: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question To: "prakash patel" <[email protected]>, "jastorino" <[email protected]> Cc: ccie_rs <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Are there any options to modify this behavior? If R1 and R3 are announcing the same group, is there a way to modify the default behavior and make R1 the preferred RP without adding higher IP address on R1? Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: prakash patel [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:38 AM AST To: Robert Wyzykowski; <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question Cisco Announce group. The Mapping Agents serve as the Rendezvous Point election agency by listening to the Cisco Announce group to receive Candidate-RP Announcements, selecting the highest IP address Candidate-RP for a group range and then multicast the election results to the 224.0.1.40 Cisco Discovery group. All Cisco routers in the network automatically join the 224.0.1.40 group so that they can learn the IP address of the elected Rendezvous Point for each group range. From: [email protected] Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:34:36 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question I know in BSR we have the priority option. What is the similar option for auto-rp? From: Robert S Wyzykowski [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:31 AM AST To: "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] General multicast question When using auto-rp... If there are two RPs announcing the same group, how does the mapping agent decide which RP to announce for the group? What is the criteria for the election process? Thanks. From: Joe Astorino [[email protected]] Sent: 07/04/2009 10:15 AM AST To: "Meraz, Richard" <[email protected]> Cc: CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Vol2 Sect8 Task6.1 VRRP and Object Tracking This solution looks perfectly valid to me Richard. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Meraz, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: Task 6.1 asks us to configure VRRP and ?If R5 loses the route to 172.30.21.0, or the metric increases, it should not be preferred gateway.? I configured the following: IPeR5#sir 172.30.21.0 Routing entry for 172.30.21.0/24 Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 65 track 1 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 reachability track 2 ip route 172.30.21.0/24 metric threshold threshold metric up 65 down 66 track 100 list boolean or object 1 object 2 int fa0/0 vrrp 1 priority 150 vrrp 1 track 100 decrement 75 The PG did not use the track 100 list boolean or option. I?m still a bit unsure about tracking with multiple objects, and using the and/or boolean, so I was wondering if the above configuration would be considered correct or not? Thanks, Rich -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live? SkyDrive?: Get 25 GB of free online storage. http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_SD_25GB_062009 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090704/1d71c518/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 07:45:55 -0700 From: Stan <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] TEST QOS To: Karim Ikherbane <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Message-ID: <c674b933.1efb%[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Karim, I would just enable http server on some of the routers and server their IOS images. On the client side copy that to null: . Another approach would be to use IP SLA probes, this should cover most of the things you need to test. Last but not least, don?t forget extended pings with custom packet sizes. Cheers, Stan On 7/4/09 3:57 AM, "Karim Ikherbane" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I am seeking a Network Traffic Generator Software. I want to simulate a lot of > traffic like ... > ?I need it to test QoS Policy's Dynamips lab. ... > is there a way to generate traffic between two Cisco IOS routers in order > to test any help or points would much apprecaited > .net file? this file is working fine but l don`t know what to do to generate > like http or any protocol to test ths lab > > ?? autostart = false > ??? [127.0.0.1:7200 <http://127.0.0.1:7200> ] > ??? udp = 10000 > ??? [[3725]] > ??? image = C:\Program Files\Dynamips\images\C3725-AD.BIN > ??? idlepc = 0x6148b534 > ??? ram = 128 > ??? mmap = False > ??? confreg = 0x2102 > > > > ??? [[Router ALS1]] > ??? model = 3725 > ??? slot1 = NM-16ESW > ??? F1/1 = R1 F0/0 > ??? F1/2 = R1 F0/1 > ??? F1/3 = R2 F0/0 > ??? F1/4 = R2 F0/1 > ??? F1/5 = R3 F0/0 > ??? F1/6 = R3 F0/1 > ??? F1/7 = R4 F0/0 > ??? F1/8 = R4 F0/1 > ??? idlepc = 0x6148b534 > ???????? > > > > ??? [[Router R1]] > ??? model = 3725 > ???? idlepc = 0x6148b534 > > > ??? [[Router R2]] > ??? model = 3725 > ??? idlepc = 0x6148b534 > > > ??? [[Router R3]] > ??? model = 3725 > ??? > ??? idlepc = 0x6148b534 > ??? #0x6148b594 > > > > ??? autostart = false > ??? [127.0.0.1:7201 <http://127.0.0.1:7201> ] > ??? udp = 11000 > ??? [[2621]] > ??? image = C:\Program Files\Dynamips\images\C2600-TS.BIN > ??? idlepc = 0x8045b234 > ??? ram = 96 > ??? mmap = False > ??? confreg = 0x2102 > Jam > > ?? [[Router R4]] > ??? model = 2621 > ??? idlepc = 0x8045b234 > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090704/d657795c/attachment.htm End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 21 *************************************** The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
