Robert, Im sorry to hear that. I hope you decide to take all that anger and apply it to more studying :) Your too far into to give up now but what a bummer!! I have (working on it) this problem many times while doing my poly-labs and Mock labs where I thought 100% that I answered the question only to get the score report back :(. It taught me to work on my verification and to slow down a little bit. How did you feel about the Core knowledge section? Did you have enough time at the end to verify? Best of luck to you next time...I will be posting my report in 18 days :)
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2009 11:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11 Send CCIE_RS mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_rs or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CCIE_RS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces (Robert S Wyzykowski) 2. lab 27 - advanced bgp config - bgp community (Mark Matters) 3. Re: Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces (Bryan Bartik) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:56:28 -0400 From: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces To: "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]>, "Joe Astorino" <[email protected]> Cc: ccie_rs <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I failed miserably. I thought I did well til I got my score. Zero on qos Zero on ios features 25 on bgp. I thought I nailed all these topics. I don't understand how I got zero points. So much 10 years of experience and one solid year of cramming of the exam. ----- Original Message ----- From: Carlos Valero [[email protected]] Sent: 07/02/2009 02:41 PM MST To: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces Hello Joe, Any word on this? I'm just curious to know how you are able to do Trunking on a 10-BaseT interface. I thought that wasn't possible.? At least not on a 2610! I've tried with several IOS versions including the latest one (12.3.26) and the "encapsulation" command is not available. Please let me know.? Thank you! --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces To: "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 7:53 PM Hi Carlos, As soon as I can get access to a Proctor Labs rack, I will let you know. On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Carlos Valero <[email protected]> wrote: Hello Joe, Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB Routers? Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q? on the Ethernet interfaces on these Routers. But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an Ethernet interface. I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. Could you please let me know? Thank you! --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]> wrote: From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology To: "'Terry Vinson'" <[email protected]>, [email protected] Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM Hey Terry, Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said.? I would have to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where you HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Vinson Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology Hi Guys, I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's and 2 3560's.? I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed).? My question is where should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities?? I have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. Thanks, Terry Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 05:53:00 -- Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090702/f019ba1e/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 23:10:44 -0400 From: Mark Matters <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] lab 27 - advanced bgp config - bgp community To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" task: Ensure that the IP prefix for 100.100.101.0 is not propagated beyond AS 8888. Why don't I see 100.100.100.0 advertised? r4 router bgp 65522 no synchronization bgp log-neighbor-changes bgp confederation identifier 8888 bgp confederation peers 65511 65533 network 100.100.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 100.100.101.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 150.50.100.2 remote-as 65522 neighbor 150.50.100.2 send-community neighbor 150.50.100.2 route-map NOEXPORT out no auto-summary ! access-list 1 permit 100.100.101.0 0.0.0.255 ! route-map NOEXPORT permit 10 match ip address 1 set community no-export ! route-map NOEXPORT permit 20 r2 Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>i100.100.101.0/24 150.50.100.4 0 100 0 i * 172.16.0.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.1.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.2.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.3.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i *> 192.168.0.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.0.0/22 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.1.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.3.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i R2(config-router)#do sho ip route 100.100.100.0 % Subnet not in table R2(config-router)#do sho ip route 100.100.101.0 Routing entry for 100.100.101.0/24 Known via "bgp 65522", distance 200, metric 0, type internal Last update from 150.50.100.4 00:07:13 ago Routing Descriptor Blocks: * 150.50.100.4, from 150.50.100.4, 00:07:13 ago Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1 AS Hops 0 R2(config-router)#do sh ip bgp nei 150.50.100.4 routes BGP table version is 21, local router ID is 150.50.2.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>i100.100.101.0/24 150.50.100.4 0 100 0 i Total number of prefixes 1 * As soon as I take the community off I see both 100.100.100.0 and 100.100.101.0* R2#sho ip bgp BGP table version is 23, local router ID is 150.50.2.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>i100.100.100.0/24 150.50.100.4 0 100 0 i *>i100.100.101.0/24 150.50.100.4 0 100 0 i * 172.16.0.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.1.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.2.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i * 172.16.3.0/24 150.50.200.2 0 100 0 (65511) 500 i *> 192.168.0.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.0.0/22 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.1.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i *> 192.168.3.0 150.50.20.1 0 100 0 (65511) i -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090702/a63a48fa/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 21:14:44 -0600 From: Bryan Bartik <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces To: Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]> Cc: ccie_rs <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Robert, Sorry to hear the news. I know it must be frustrating but the last thing you should do is give up. Take a short break and keep going at it. You will pass if you keep learning. On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Robert S Wyzykowski <[email protected]>wrote: > I failed miserably. > > I thought I did well til I got my score. > > Zero on qos > Zero on ios features > 25 on bgp. > > I thought I nailed all these topics. I don't understand how I got zero > points. > > So much 10 years of experience and one solid year of cramming of the exam. > ------------------------------ > > * From: *Carlos Valero [[email protected]] > * Sent: *07/02/2009 02:41 PM MST > * To: *Joe Astorino <[email protected]> > > * Cc: *[email protected] > * Subject: *Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q > Ethernet 10-BaseT interfaces > > Hello Joe, > > Any word on this? > > I'm just curious to know how you are able to do Trunking on a 10-BaseT > interface. > > I thought that wasn't possible. At least not on a 2610! > > I've tried with several IOS versions including the latest one (12.3.26) and > the "encapsulation" command is not available. > > Please let me know. Thank you! > > > > --- On *Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino <[email protected]>* wrote: > > > From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about encapsulation dot1q Ethernet > 10-BaseT interfaces > To: "Carlos Valero" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 7:53 PM > > Hi Carlos, > > As soon as I can get access to a Proctor Labs rack, I will let you know. > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Carlos Valero > <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> >> >> >> Hello Joe, >> >> Could you please tell me what IOS version you use in your 2610 BB >> Routers? >> >> Labs Vol 3.9 & 3.10 use encapsulation dot1q on the Ethernet interfaces >> on these Routers. >> >> But so far I have NOT found an IOS version that allows do1Q on an >> Ethernet interface. >> I thoughy you could only do that with a Fast Ethernet interface. >> >> Could you please let me know? >> >> Thank you! >> >> >> --- On *Wed, 7/1/09, Joe Astorino >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> >* wrote: >> >> >> From: Joe Astorino >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> > >> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> To: "'Terry Vinson'" >> <[email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]>>, >> [email protected]<http://mc/[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 2:06 PM >> >> Hey Terry, >> >> Well, in our topology we have Cat2-Cat4 as 3560 like you said. I would >> have >> to go through every lab and really see if there are any situations where >> you >> HAVE to have a 3560 to do something on a particular switch. >> >> Regards, >> >> Joe Astorino >> CCIE #24347 (R&S) >> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. >> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Terry Vinson >> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:57 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Question about topology >> >> Hi Guys, >> >> I use dynamips and 4 real switches in my personal rack. I have 2 3550's >> and 2 3560's. I see that the Version 11 Workbook 1 topology has 3 >> 3560's, well that's not happening financially over here for quite >> sometime (if ever if my wife is to be believed). My question is where >> should I use the 2 3560's to get the best coverage of capabilities? I >> have to assume it will make a difference on some of the Switching labs, >> but I don't see a huge impact on the layer 3 stuff other than IPv6. >> >> Thanks, >> Terry >> >> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.0/2210 - Release Date: 07/01/09 >> 05:53:00 >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Joe Astorino > CCIE #24347 (R&S) > Sr. Support Engineer ? IPexpert, Inc. > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com > > > -- Bryan Bartik CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_rs/attachments/20090702/4f548d52/attachment.htm End of CCIE_RS Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11 ***************************************
