Bauke, I think you have an issue with your prefix-list there. You are denying a /32 , is that network a /32? Since it ends in 0 that would be odd
Regards, Joe Astorino CCIE #24347 (R&S) Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -----Original Message----- From: Bauke Dzavhale <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:29:22 To: <[email protected]> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] LAB 7 Vol 2- Task 7-2 Team, The routes 10.12.1.0, 10.12.20, 10.12.3.0 have been created in R2 and advertised by BGP throughout the network. The idea is to make R8 deny the subnet 10.12.1.0 in its routing table. Below you can see a snapshot of the config at R8....the problem is that R8 still has the route in its routing table. How is that? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- router bgp 78 no synchronization bgp router-id 192.168.8.8 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 10.78.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 10.78.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 network 10.78.3.0 mask 255.255.255.0 neighbor 192.168.7.7 remote-as 78 neighbor 192.168.7.7 update-source Loopback1 neighbor 192.168.7.7 prefix-list R1-Routes in no auto-summary ! ! ! ip prefix-list R1-Routes seq 5 deny 10.12.1.0/32 ip prefix-list R1-Routes seq 10 permit 0.0.0.0/0 le 32 ! R8#sir B 10.12.2.0 [200/0] via 192.168.5.5, 01:04:49 B 10.12.3.0 [200/0] via 192.168.5.5, 01:04:49 B 10.12.1.0 [200/0] via 192.168.5.5, 01:04:49 Thanks Bauke __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
