I imagine this new solar farm will be leased by Cornell, but built / maintained 
by a third party just like the one at the airport. For the solar company low 
installation cost will be the driving factor. Many separate panels all over 
campus installed by Cornell wouldn't be as cost effective and CU would have to 
maintain them.
The PSC got rid of net metering for residential solar this week so I suspect 
individual homeowner installation will become less desirable even as it has 
also been moving to leased systems.

Gary

On Mar 22, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Melanie Uhlir 
<mela...@mwmu.com<mailto:mela...@mwmu.com>> wrote:

I wish all parking lots had solar panels over them. It would be win-win since 
it would shade the parking lots and they are giant heat-generators and wasted 
space anyway. Put solar panels on top of malls too. On top of hospitals, 
industrial buildings, schools. There are lots of non-habitat spaces solar 
panels ought to go instead of places that support wildlife. Why is that not 
happening?

(yard bird news: I still had 2 Fox Sparrows visiting as of yesterday. I haven't 
seen them today.)

On 3/21/2017 5:40 PM, Dave Nutter wrote:
If the goal is to reduce greenhouse gas production, then cutting down trees
is counterproductive when installing solar panels. Also cutting trees down if 
they
are just along the edge of the array makes little sense because the great 
majority
of solar energy is during the middle of the day, not early morning nor late 
afternoon.

Putting solar panels in places that are just creating heat islands, not 
habitats, makes
lots of sense. Put them on rooftops. Put them over parking lots. Put them on 
lawns
that were already getting mowed. That's why home solar is great, but industrial 
scale
makes problems. Those fields that are being replaced as solar "farms" (cute 
name)
will still get rain and have seeds blow in. How will succession be blocked? 
Poisons?

If Cornell first decided to put solar panels on all its rooftops and over all 
its parking
lots, then over, say, the Ag Quad, and had run out places where they could put 
solar
panels without being destructive, I'd be more supportive. I think that grove is 
pretty
special, having seen several Long-eared Owls and a Northern Saw-whet Owl there.

--Dave Nutter

On Mar 20, 2017, at 12:18 PM, marsha kardon 
<mfkar...@gmail.com<mailto:mfkar...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Please consider this in your efforts to minimize your contribution to climate 
change:

Rearing cattle produces more greenhouse gases than driving cars, UN report warns
[http://static.un.org/News/dh/photos/11-29-fao-livestock.jpg]
6.3K<http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?newsID=20772#>Share

 Print<http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?newsID=20772#>

29 November 2006 – Cattle-rearing generates more global warming greenhouse 
gases, as measured in CO2 equivalent, than transportation, and smarter 
production methods, including improved animal diets to reduce enteric 
fermentation and consequent methane emissions, are urgently needed, according 
to<http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2006/1000448/index.html> a new United 
Nations report released today.

“Livestock are one of the most significant contributors to today’s most serious 
environmental problems,” senior UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 
official Henning Steinfeld said. “Urgent action is required to remedy the 
situation.”

Cattle-rearing is also a major source of land and water degradation, according 
to the FAO report, Livestock’s Long Shadow–Environmental Issues and 
Options<http://www.virtualcentre.org/en/library/key_pub/longshad/A0701E00.htm>, 
of which Mr. Steinfeld is the senior author.

“The environmental costs per unit of livestock production must be cut by one 
half, just to avoid the level of damage worsening beyond its present level,” it 
warns.

When emissions from land use and land use change are included, the livestock 
sector accounts for 9 per cent of CO2 deriving from human-related activities, 
but produces a much larger share of even more harmful greenhouse gases. It 
generates 65 per cent of human-related nitrous oxide, which has 296 times the 
Global Warming Potential (GWP) of CO2. Most of this comes from manure.

And it accounts for respectively 37 per cent of all human-induced methane (23 
times as warming as CO2), which is largely produced by the digestive system of 
ruminants, and 64 per cent of ammonia, which contributes significantly to acid 
rain.

With increased prosperity, people are consuming more meat and dairy products 
every year, the report notes. Global meat production is projected to more than 
double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/2001 to 465 million tonnes in 2050, 
while milk output is set to climb from 580 to 1043 million tonnes.

The global livestock sector is growing faster than any other agricultural 
sub-sector. It provides livelihoods to about 1.3 billion people and contributes 
about 40 per cent to global agricultural output. For many poor farmers in 
developing countries livestock are also a source of renewable energy for draft 
and an essential source of organic fertilizer for their crops.

Livestock now use 30 per cent of the earth’s entire land surface, mostly 
permanent pasture but also including 33 per cent of the global arable land used 
to producing feed for livestock, the report notes. As forests are cleared to 
create new pastures, it is a major driver of deforestation, especially in Latin 
America where, for example, some 70 per cent of former forests in the Amazon 
have been turned over to grazing.

At the same time herds cause wide-scale land degradation, with about 20 per 
cent of pastures considered degraded through overgrazing, compaction and 
erosion. This figure is even higher in the drylands where inappropriate 
policies and inadequate livestock management contribute to advancing 
desertification.

The livestock business is among the most damaging sectors to the earth’s 
increasingly scarce water resources, contributing among other things to water 
pollution from animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from 
tanneries, fertilizers and the pesticides used to spray feed crops.

Beyond improving animal diets, proposed remedies to the multiple problems 
include soil conservation methods together with controlled livestock exclusion 
from sensitive areas; setting up biogas plant initiatives to recycle manure; 
improving efficiency of irrigation systems; and introducing full-cost pricing 
for water together with taxes to discourage large-scale livestock concentration 
close to cities.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Martha Fischer 
<m...@cornell.edu<mailto:m...@cornell.edu>> wrote:
Dear All -

Please make a commitment to USE LESS ENERGY.

        Turn off lights that are not being used.

        Reduce your use of the clothes dryer and other conveniences.

        Accept inconvenience.

And then let¹s have this discussion.

Take care,

Martha Fischer
Town of Enfield

On 3/20/17, 9:48 AM, 
"bounce-121351030-3494...@list.cornell.edu<mailto:bounce-121351030-3494...@list.cornell.edu>
 on behalf
of Nari Mistry" 
<bounce-121351030-3494...@list.cornell.edu<mailto:bounce-121351030-3494...@list.cornell.edu>
 on behalf of
n...@cornell.edu<mailto:n...@cornell.edu>> wrote:

>There is urgent need for lovers of birds and wildlife along Dodge Rd. to
>be aware of imminent developments along Dodge Rd.
>
>The massive industrial scale solar farm proposed in all the Cornell
>owned fields along Dodge Rd and Stevenson Rd (as well as Turkey Hill
>Rd.) is planning to start construction in a few weeks.  There was a
>hearing in Dryden last Thursday at which many residents spoke out
>against the massive scale of the project which will devastate wildlife
>habitat.
>
>We have just learned this morning from a member of the Dryden
>Conservation Board that they are proposing to cut down the Spruce Woods
>bordering the WEST side of Dodge Rd. because they will shadow the panels
>slated to go right along the very edge of Dodge R. next to a
>(barbed-wire topped) fence!
>
>If you are concerned about this assault and the effect of replacing all
>the grassland in the fields with sod under the panels (and
>herbicides???), please write immediately to the Dryden Town Board and
>ATTEND THE PLANNING BOARD MEETING  scheduled on THIS Thursday March 23,
>at 7pm at the Dryden Town Hall on Main Street.
>
>Please express your opinion that may help reduce the scale of this
>commercial operation that will devastate wildlife in this favorite
>location for viewing wildlife!
>
>  Nari & Gin Mistry
>
>  Ellis Hollow rd.
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Cayugabirds-L List Info:
>http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
>http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
>http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm
>
>ARCHIVES:
>1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
>2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
>3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html
>
>Please submit your observations to eBird:
>http://ebird.org/content/ebird/
>
>--


--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--


--
Cayugabirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME>
Rules and Information<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES>
Subscribe, Configuration and 
Leave<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>
Archives:
The Mail 
Archive<http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html>
Surfbirds<http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds>
BirdingOnThe.Net<http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html>
Please submit your observations to eBird<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/>!
--
--
Cayugabirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME>
Rules and Information<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES>
Subscribe, Configuration and 
Leave<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>
Archives:
The Mail 
Archive<http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html>
Surfbirds<http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds>
BirdingOnThe.Net<http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html>
Please submit your observations to eBird<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/>!
--


--
Cayugabirds-L List Info:
Welcome and Basics<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME>
Rules and Information<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES>
Subscribe, Configuration and 
Leave<http://www.northeastbirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>
Archives:
The Mail 
Archive<http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html>
Surfbirds<http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds>
BirdingOnThe.Net<http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html>
Please submit your observations to eBird<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/>!
--

--

Cayugabirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsWELCOME
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsRULES
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/CayugabirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/cayugabirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/Cayugabirds
3) http://birdingonthe.net/mailinglists/CAYU.html

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to