Hi Dimitar, * Dimitar Petrov <[email protected]> [2013-05-14 12:35]: > That's the proposition based on Bill's answer: > https://github.com/dpetrov/catalyst-runtime/commit/391a98ed4e386af9ef11a3d4ea979f1e6a3c51f4
not sure why you’re replying to me, I don’t see a warning there. > Any thoughts? Needs a more specific name than `detach_on_die`. In my fork I called the option `abort_dispatch_in_chains_on_exception`. > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[email protected]>wrote: > > > * Tomas Doran <[email protected]> [2013-05-10 19:55]: > > > We should make it a config variable that defaults to the old behaviour > > > but adjust -Devel to default it to true in new apps. > > > > > > This keeps back compat, but makes new apps behave 'correctly'. > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > Should there be a warning in old apps when an exception gets swallowed? > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/> _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
