On 3 Jul 2012, at 09:14, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: > It was (1) if ntpd in the vm wasn't running according to what I've read.
Wasn't running? eh? The bug in question was only triggered when ntpd _WAS_ running, and had signalled the kernel to take the leap second. Your statement is, I guess, a typo? Cheers t0m _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
