On 21 Apr 2012, at 13:30, Bill Moseley wrote:
> The code above looks like it was trying to fix some flow problems (populating 
> the attribute directly as a hash, for example), so the real fix is probably 
> something else.  Perhaps a builder on body_parameters so that it isn't 
> populated every call.
> 
> This look like a bug?

Yes, it does.

Your proposed solution sounds entirely reasonable also.

>  Or should I not be adding method modifiers to prepare_body_parameters?
> 
> BTW -- the reason I used "after prepare_body_parameters" is so that 
> $c->req->parameters ends up with any changes I make to the body_parameters.

Yeah, I think it's perfectly reasonable usage, and we should fix it to only be 
called once - even if only for efficiencies sake.

Could we start with some failing tests for your use-case?

Thanks in advance!
Cheers
Tomas


_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to