I've been very happy using http://ikiwiki.info/, written in Perl, the backend 
is conveniently a git repo.

--Peter



>________________________________
> From: Roderick A. Anderson <[email protected]>
>To: The elegant MVC web framework <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2012, 15:19
>Subject: Re: [Catalyst] Wiki down
> 
>ShinyCMS? www.shinycms.org
>
>From themain page.
>...
>ShinyCMS is built in Perl using the Catalyst framework.
>...
>
>
>\\||/
>Rod
>-- Dimitar Petrov wrote:
>> Toby, as far as I know t0m want to fix that issue once he got little bit 
>> more time. 
>> I was not pointing at you to fix that issue actually. After I've mentioned 
>> that yesterday in #catalyst, Marcus Bamberg (marcus) noted that he got a few 
>> other wikis and he never experienced such a problem and I think no one 
>> reported memory leaks in mojomojo. 
>> I fully agree with everything that you've said already and I really think 
>> that Catalyst (and actually not only Catalyst, but Perl as well) should be 
>> working a little bit harder of the marketing side and the first impression.
>> 
>> Would you mind joining #catalyst at irc.perl.org <http://irc.perl.org> and 
>> discuss that over there? :)
>> 
>> PS: Both designs are great... +1 vote for version 1 :)
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Dimitar
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Tobias Kremer <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>>     On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Dimitar Petrov <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>      > I've asked yesterday at #catalyst and it seems to be unmodified
>>     mojomojo
>>      > installation. The reason it's 503ing sometimes is probably memory
>>     leak. You
>>      > can ask there to get more information.
>> 
>>     Thanks Dimitar, but I'm certainly not going to fix memory leaks in an
>>     IMHO broken wiki software which compared to other alternatives never
>>     really worked that well in the first place (and I've done my fair
>>     share of edits in it). No offense to the creators/maintainers.
>>     Unfortunately, migrating to a more widely used software (which just
>>     works) is probably unwanted (because it probably isn't written in
>>     Perl) and non-trivial.
>> 
>>     And before everyone starts shouting "well volunteered" because I'm
>>     obviously just ranting and not doing anything to change the situation,
>>     here's one I prepared earlier (couple of years ago TBH) which
>>     unfortunately never saw the light of day:
>>    http://www.funkreich.de/catalyst/
>> 
>>     Sorry for getting all emotional, but I'm somewhat frustrated that the
>>     leading Perl MVC framework still has that same old pathetic and often
>>     broken website. Is this something somebody is already working on?
>> 
>>     --Toby
>> 
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     List: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
>>     Searchable archive:
>>    http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>>     Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> List: [email protected]
>> Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
>> Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>
>_______________________________________________
>List: [email protected]
>Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
>Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to