(02:28:32 PM) phenny: davewood: 21 Dec 16:54Z <t0m> tell davewood there isn't really a smarter way yet, I'd just always extend that base class
I am going to use ActionRole::MatchRequestMethod so C::C::ActionRole is a requirement anyways now. thanks. On 22 December 2011 14:21, David Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > I came across another issue. > > CatalystX::Resource injects a controller into the app. the controller > extends Catalyst::Controller. > > If I want to use Catalyst::ActionRole::ACL to deal with Authorization > on my resources the controller needs to extend C::C::ActionRole. > > Should I extend from C::C::ActionRole or is there a smarter way to > change the base class only when the extra functionality is required? > > david _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
