To get the discussion back on track: I switched from Session::Store::DBIC to Session::Store::DBI on our production systems a couple of hours ago and haven't had a single duplicate key constraint error. Yay!
I'll file a bug report for C::P::Session::Store::DBIC. Cheers! --Toby On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Will Crawford <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10 October 2011 16:00, Tobias Kremer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthias Dietrich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Am 10.10.2011 um 15:59 schrieb Denny: >>>> The word you both want is 'lose'. Loose means something slightly >>>> different (and slightly odd, when discussing data). >> >> Absolutely! Sorry for the typo :) >> >>> Your right ;-). >> >> And that's almost as bad as "would of been" ... ;-) > > Your quiet riot :) > > _______________________________________________ > List: [email protected] > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
