On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Mark Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
>
> It looks like proxies are supported everywhere.
>

Unfortunately a lot of people still use old browsers.

http://caniuse.com/#feat=proxy -- click on the "usage relative" box.

-Kenton


>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sweet!
>>
>> Totally random comment from totally randomly opening a file and looking
>> at it:
>>
>> I see lists are accessed via a method .get(n). Have you considered using
>> proxies to allow array subscript [] syntax? I guess some 10-20% of browsers
>> still don't support proxies but that number will only go down.
>>
>> -Kenton
>>
>> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Julián Díaz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm happy to report some real progress!
>>>
>>> https://github.com/jdiaz5513/capnp-ts
>>>
>>> Right now it's not very useful at all (I just barely have serialization
>>> working) but it's a solid starting point to wrap up the serialization API.
>>> The peanut gallery can start poking around to see how I organized things –
>>> it does depart slightly from the reference implementation but I'm still
>>> aiming to make an external API that's very similar to the C++ one.
>>>
>>> Once the Struct/List classes are complete I'll move on to the schema
>>> compiler, which looks like it'll be a cinch. Hoping I can keep up the
>>> steady progress from here.
>>>
>>> On Monday, April 10, 2017 at 1:45:01 AM UTC-4, Ian Denhardt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Quoting Kenton Varda (2017-04-09 18:35:48)
>>>>
>>>> >    1) libcapnp and libkj together add up to some 730k of code (text
>>>> >    segment) these days. Unless emscripten builds are significantly
>>>> >    smaller, that's probably too big.
>>>>
>>>> Hard to know without trying it, but it may well be the case that wasm
>>>> builds will be smaller. The VM seems to be designed for small code size
>>>> (sensibly, given its target use case). This obviously doesn't apply to
>>>> the asm.js output.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I agree having a pure JS implementation is preferable.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Cap'n Proto" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Cap'n Proto" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
>>
>
>
>
> --
>   Cheers,
>   --MarkM
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Cap'n Proto" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cap'n Proto" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.

Reply via email to