An entirely reasonable stance. This was precisely the sort of insight I was trying to gain. Thanks!
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017, 11:40 AM Kenton Varda <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO, the file extension should identify the specific type, such that it > can be used to figure out what application can open the file. I don't think > it's particularly useful to give a file an extension that indicates "Cap'n > Proto encoding" without also indicating the specific type. (I have the same > opinion about Protocol Buffers.) > > -Kenton > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Ross Light <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is an entirely pedantic question, but what extension do/should folks > use for serialized Cap'n Proto files on disk? > > > -Ross > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Cap'n Proto" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cap'n Proto" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
