On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Johannes Zeppenfeld <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Kenton, > > Since detach would only ever be called from within the callback itself the > promise couldn't be canceled anymore anyways, and stack unwinding would > only destroy things allocated within the callback itself, so that shouldn't > be a problem. > Good point. Indeed, that seems safe... > However, it sounds like returning the promise is the (intended) way to go. > > Is there some way to ask a promise whether it is currently executing? That > would avoid an additional member in the implementation struct to track that > myself. > Sorry, there isn't. -Kenton > > Thanks for the recommendation! > Johannes > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Cap'n Proto" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cap'n Proto" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/capnproto.
