from skia: from a very quick look, besides some function/variable naming, I'd say this is mostly OK. Maybe adding a "comment" key to the testinfo.json content, stating that this was touched by this script, with a date, would be good, for tracability.
But, I think with the urgent matter of burning the queues before Friday to get images to build, we should wait before putting any more stress on swift. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~andersson123/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/463593 Your team Canonical's Ubuntu QA is requested to review the proposed merge of ~andersson123/autopkgtest-cloud:swift-cleanup into autopkgtest-cloud:master. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa Post to : canonical-ubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~canonical-ubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
