Yeah, that's the bit that has me confused, also. Even before seeing
your comment, I was wondering why it would set the value, then create
another UUID. I don't get it.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Rob Wilkerson <r...@robwilkerson.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:42 PM, brian <bally.z...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I confess that I'm really not at all clear about what Cake is doing
>> here. That doesn't make sense to me. It appears to be deliberately
>> including the UUID twice.
>
> Yes and no. I've done a little more digging and the method is taking
> two parameters properly: the ID of the new event that got created and
> an array containing the model name and ID of the attraction object (
> 'Attraction' => '49414268-8a90-4497-856a-1b293b196446' ). This all
> looks great. The problem seems to be introduced here:
>
> 01287 if ((is_string($row) && (strlen($row) == 36 || strlen($row) ==
> 16)) || is_numeric($row)) {
> 01288 $values = array(
> 01289 $db->value($id, $this->getColumnType($this->primaryKey)),
> 01290 $db->value($row)
> 01291 );
> 01292 if ($isUUID) {
> 01293 $values[] = $db->value(String::uuid());
> 01294 }
>
> Specifically, my problem is that the data passes both tests. The first
> test properly sets the value to the UUID for the attraction while the
> second test just pushes a brand new UUID on the values array. I'll see
> whether I can get any answers on the IRC channel.
>
> Thanks for getting me started with the code snippet.
>
> --
> Rob Wilkerson
> http://robwilkerson.org
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
