>     I think, modifying core is necessary evil. To bend it for the
>  UIMS, it's extremely necessary.

I need to do my research in the area before arguing.

>  Another change that seems extremely
>  necessary is component vs model namespace confusion (You don't know
>  what is foo in $this->foo: if model or component).

I can live with that confusion ;)

>  I'll try to prepare
>  a draft with changes and if others agree, I'll proceed. But, IMHO,
>  they looks necessary. May also take some ideas from orchid and fase
>  frameworks. And, thanks for your comments and ideas.

Looking forward to see it, as I said before it's an area of interest for me.

About modifying the core, I still don't feel comfortable with that (
and I've already done it for a couple of my projects ), the thing that
worries me the most is the dupplicattion of effort. I think many
things can be done with conventions, say naming things in determinated
way or inheriting from some base class, ie use CRUDSController for
base instead of AppController.

Also I agree about your idea of openness, there are lots of successful
open projects, and keeping that in mind is that I suggest you have a
look at git ( http://git.or.cz/ ), it's a distributed SCM, where every
one has the full history of the project so no repository is more
important than the other and it encoourages truly parallel
development.

That said, good lock!

- Dardo Sordi.

>  --
>   <?php echo 'Just another PHP saint'; ?>
>  Email: rrjanbiah-at-Y!com    Blog: http://rajeshanbiah.blogspot.com/
>  >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to