for the client that I have that insisted on that style of url, I used
essentially what nate suggests in the linked thread above and it has
been working flawlessly for more then a year.

On 10/1/07, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/66dc2488f95ca098/ca7b7ea5403ccf62
>
> On Oct 1, 3:37 pm, gwoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @Wayne
> > good try, but that is perhaps one of the worst ideas I have seen in a
> > while
> >
> > @Joel
> > using the router is the proper way to achieve your goes. But obviously
> > you could end up with a lot of routes and who really wants to write a
> > new route every time you add an action.
> > That said, there is an enhancement ticket for this if I am not
> > mistaken. And even if there isnt, it is in the plan for 1.2.
> >
> > What I would suggest is build your application and worry about your
> > urls later. Also, if you read up on SEO "_" is better for things like
> > controller an actions (at least with Google). The underscore
> > represents a directory whereas the "-" will be seen as individual
> > keywords. But we will spend to much time discussing SEO, so my
> > suggestion is build your app and worry about SEO when you find
> > yourself low on the rankings.
>
>
> >
>


-- 
(the old fart) the advice is free, the lack of crankiness will cost you

- its a fine line between a real question and an idiot

http://blog.samdevore.com/archives/2007/03/05/when-open-source-bugs-me/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cake 
PHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to