Just another sore subject to get the old farts excited.

> On Apr 2, 2017, at 11:25 AM, Pat Cameron via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> What's a woodchuck thread?
> 
>> On Apr 2, 2017 10:03 AM, "Rick Hiller -- W5RH via BVARC" <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Well now, let's see...
>> 
>> No political comments -- then no discussion about HR555.
>> 
>> No religious comments -- then no discussion about the propagation, sun 
>> spots, solar storms, because that is Mother Nature/God -- the ultimate OP, 
>> no matter what building you go into Friday, Saturday or Sunday.
>> 
>> No humorous comments.....oh, no humor, sorry, I'll stop here then.
>> 
>> C'mon folks, if your whole day is consumed by what comes across the BVARC 
>> reflector and you do not know what a delete key is, then you deserve to be 
>> miserable.  Even Dr. Feinman had a sense of humor. 
>> 
>> 73 (sincerely) Rick -- W5RH
>> 
>> ps...keep complaiing and I will start the wood chuck thread 
>> again....Oh..,,sorry, no humor allowed.  My apologies.
>> 
>> Rick Hiller 
>> The Radio Hotel  -- W5RH
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Pat Cameron via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>> I vote for that! ( and the code requirement :-)
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 2, 2017 8:56 AM, "K5HM" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I do not care for political or religious comments but if we ban humor, 
>>>> well, that is a step too far.
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> There is precious little ham humor in our hobby.  We all seen to take 
>>>> ourselves too seriously.  Next thing you know, we will be bannibg the 
>>>> expressions of humor like words like  Ha Ha or Hee Hee Heee.
>>>> 
>>>> Come on  April 1st. OK?
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 73,
>>>> 
>>>> Ron, K5HM
>>>> 
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> www.qrz.com/db/k5hm
>>>> 
>>>> <image003.jpg>
>>>> 
>>>>         Excelsior!
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> From: BVARC [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pat Cameron via 
>>>> BVARC
>>>> Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 7:16 AM
>>>> To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: Pat Cameron <[email protected]>; Michael Monsour <[email protected]>
>>>> Subject: Re: [BVARC] Trash on our Amateur Radio reflector
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Can we take a vote?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Pat Cameron
>>>> 
>>>> (832)885-2899
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:08 AM, K5IZO via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Michael, I agree.
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Let's keep this reflector for ham radio so we don't have to receive this 
>>>> garbage. Political views, sinkholes and April Fools trash isn't welcome 
>>>> here.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 2, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Michael Monsour via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> If you are going to do April 1st stuff then have the FCC turn ham radio 
>>>> into CB. No more calls and free for all and anything goes
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jeff Davis via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I enjoyed it, I’ve been hit with so many today that it was getting old.  
>>>> Then this one and man I swallowed it hook line and oh you know.
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> it wasn’t till I went back to read it again and saw the date that I went, 
>>>> oh crap, I fell for one.
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> KF5HQE Jeff
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 1, 2017, at 10:12 PM, gmuller885 via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Just haveing fun michael. Don't take it so seriously.
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Michael Monsour via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>>> Date: 4/1/17 9:42 PM (GMT-06:00) 
>>>> To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]> 
>>>> Cc: Michael Monsour <[email protected]>, JP Pritchard <[email protected]> 
>>>> Subject: Re: [BVARC] FCC action!! 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Enough with the April 1st junk
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:03 PM, JP Pritchard via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I know this is crap since the federal government would never say in a 
>>>> press release that it had made a big mistake. Nice try Chris. You're an 
>>>> April fool.
>>>> 
>>>> JP
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> > On Apr 1, 2017, at 8:45 PM, Chris Boone via BVARC <[email protected]> 
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > FCC to reinstate Morse Code test
>>>> >
>>>> > Washington, D.C. – April 1, 2017 –
>>>> >
>>>> > Today, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) 
>>>> > approved Report and Order 14-987af which reinstates the Morse Code test 
>>>> > for General Class and Amateur Extra Class licensees.
>>>> >
>>>> > “It was a big mistake eliminating the Morse Code test,” admits Dotty 
>>>> > Dasher, the FCC’s director of examinations. “We now realize that being 
>>>> > able to send and receive Morse Code is an essential skill for radio 
>>>> > amateurs. As they say, it really does get through when other modes 
>>>> > can’t.”
>>>> >
>>>> > Not only will new applicants have to take the test, but General Class 
>>>> > licensees who have never passed a code test will have one year to pass a 
>>>> > 5-wpm code test. Similarly, Amateur Extra class licensees that never 
>>>> > passed a code test will have one year to pass a 13-wpm test. Those 
>>>> > amateurs that fail to pass the test will face revocation of their 
>>>> > operating privileges. Materials for administering the examinations will 
>>>> > be distributed to Volunteer Examiner Coordinators by the end of April, 
>>>> > so that they can begin the testing on May 1, 2017.
>>>> >
>>>> > “This isn’t going to be one of those silly multiple-choice type tests,” 
>>>> > noted Dasher. “We’re going to be sending five-character random code 
>>>> > groups, just like we did in the old days. And, applicants will have to 
>>>> > prove that they can send, too, using a poorly adjusted straight key.”
>>>> >
>>>> > Technician Class licensees will not be required to take a Morse Code 
>>>> > test, nor will a test be required for new applicants. “We discussed it,” 
>>>> > said Dasher, “but decided that since most Techs can’t even figure out 
>>>> > how to program their HTs, requiring them to learn Morse Code seemed like 
>>>> > cruel and unusual punishment.”
>>>> >
>>>> > When asked what other actions we might see from the FCC, Dasher hinted 
>>>> > that in the future applicants taking the written exam may be required to 
>>>> > draw circuit diagrams, such as Colpitts oscillators and diode ring 
>>>> > mixers, once again. “We’re beginning to think that if an applicant 
>>>> > passes an amateur radio license exam it should mean that he or she 
>>>> > actually knows something,” she said.
>>>> > ________________________________
>>>> > Cumulus Media Disclaimer
>>>> > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for 
>>>> > the individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee you should 
>>>> > not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the 
>>>> > sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake 
>>>> > and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended 
>>>> > recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or 
>>>> > taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
>>>> > strictly prohibited.
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > BVARC mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> > Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> 
>>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> BVARC mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> BVARC mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> BVARC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>> Message delivered to [email protected]
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Message delivered to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to