On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 14:35, Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 27/06/2025 11:28, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 12:03, Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27/06/2025 10:45, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 00:35, Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> That doesn't sound quite right. Any applet that uses system() or

[...]

> >> Nothing about this patch set removes the concept of user accounts, nor

[...]

> >> And if you want to engage with some AI thing to contribute to this

[...]

> >
> > You might be right on everything you wrote above. Then:
> >
> > s/patch/patchset/
> >
> > and you are not anymore, but criticize a patch forgetting the patchset.

[...]

> My message was not about this individual patch, but about the patch set.

I was reading the opposite as reported above, but you can challenge my
opinion by asking a modern chatbot if what you were writing would
allow this ambiguity. Because from a PoV of a coder, you were
challenging this patch ignoring the main goal of the patchset and the
functional meaning of the "standalone" concept. In the best scenario,
you intervened in a topic you did not grasp in their fundamentals.

***

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 at 14:35, Harald van Dijk <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> And if you want to engage with some AI thing to contribute to this
> >> discussion, I can't stop you, but it's downright offensive to say that
> >> any contribution to this that doesn't first go through that same AI
> >> thing is a waste of everyone's time.

[...]

> The only attack in this thread has been by you when you pre-emptively
> called replies that don't go through AI chat a waste of people's time.
> It is in no way a personal attack to express that I take offence to that.

Let me explain to you like you were an 8yo boy. You wrote this:

> >>  "I can't stop you, it's downright offensive to say"

You got offended and you might feel impotent, I can understand this.

Again, my full signature gives you the chance to get in touch with me
directly and stop wasting other people's time, anymore. I cannot
guarantee you that following my suggestion you wouldn't feel much more
impotent and even more offended, anyway. If you wish something to cry
for, I can help (daddy version of mum's best quote: come here darling,
I am not going to do anything bad to you). LOL

The alternative is to stop here to complain and accept the explanation
about what "standalone" means and leverage it to help coding a better
solution or simply don't and let others do. Something that it was a
choice of yours since the early beginning, after all.

Best regards, again in full



--
Roberto A. Foglietta
+49.176.274.75.661
+39.349.33.30.697
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to