On 23/08/2021 10:09, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
Il giorno lun 23 ago 2021 alle ore 10:45 Harald van Dijk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto:

    On 23/08/2021 09:16, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote:
     > IMHO, syntax error should be an exit condition either.

    I would not have a problem with you changing the shell to ensure syntax
    errors always terminate (though I cannot speak for others), but the
    problem is not limited to syntax errors, so that is not enough to fix
    the problem.

     > For the moment we can still assume that in busybox all exceptions
    are
     > deadly.

    I do not understand this, not even with your followup e-mail. You
    changed my test in which the syntax error is non-fatal to one where the
    syntax error is fatal, and then conclude from that that you can assume
    syntax errors are always fatal? That does not work. If you have two
    tests with syntax errors, where the syntax errors are fatal in only one
    of them, that means you can *not* assume all syntax errors are fatal,
    and can *not* assume all exceptions are deadly.


Hi Harald,

 we need to synchronise each other a bit. Step by step, I will try to be clearer.

  > I would not have a problem with you changing the shell to ensure syntax

 I did NOT changed anything, it is in such a way even in the original busybox. AFAIK.  In the original busybox there is no trap ERR so I cannot try but I did not changed that.

 > You changed my test in which the syntax error is non-fatal to one where the syntax error is fatal  I did not changed anything about the fatal trap. The trap you submitted is non-fatal in bash but fatal in busybox ash.

  You suggested this

  trap ")" ERR; false  (command eval false -> false)

  I did the same.

You changed command eval false to false, but the 'command' builtin was the key element there, that is what made the syntax error non-fatal. 'command eval false' is not the same thing as simply 'false' (at least not in busybox ash).

 PLEASE: confirm me we are aligned on this before I go to explain myself better on (isdeadly(e))
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Reply via email to