Is this also true for windows slaves? Our windows slaves are currently *not *open to this IP on the RDP port but work fine. Can someone shed some light on how the master is connecting to the windows slaves?
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Meghna Baijal <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Greg, that helps! > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yup. That single IP is just fine. We just spun up the master at that >> address this summer, and have no plans to move it. >> >> Cheers, >> -g >> >> On Oct 4, 2017 18:01, "Meghna Baijal" <meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks Gavin. >> > I was not sure if a single static IP is sufficient. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > > On 5 Oct 2017, at 9:39 am, Meghna Baijal < >> meghnabaijal2...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi All, >> > > > We have a set of slaves on Apache Jenkins that run MXNet builds. I >> want >> > > to >> > > > restrict the IP addresses that can access these slaves on port 22 >> > > (ubuntu) >> > > > or port 3389 (windows). >> > > > *Question*: Where can I find a fixed and sufficient set of IPs that >> the >> > > > Apache master uses to connect to these slaves? >> > > >> > > PING jenkins-master.apache.org (62.210.60.235): 56 data bytes >> > > 64 bytes from 62.210.60.235: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=362.915 ms >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Meghna Baijal >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
