Looks like our hbase 1.2 and 1.3[1] jobs seemed to be running ok with the Hadoop label, so I've updated the 1.4 [2] and master [3] jobs to use the Hadoop label as well.
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/ [2] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-1.4/ [3] https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-Trunk_matrix/ On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > Thanks Gavin. The not-h2 label was added because our jobs were failing when > they ran on h2. > > Our jobs have just started failing w/ OOMEs (HBASE-17074). You seeing that > anywhere else and if so, any input before we start trying to untangle (I > ask you because you have more insight than we do)? > > Thanks, > S > > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au> > wrote: > > > Hi HBasers! > > > > A couple of days ago I removed labels from the jenkins nodes (as promised > > in an earlier mail) and at the same > > time I changed your builds to remove the ‘yahoo-no-h2r’ label and replace > > it with ‘Hadoop’. > > > > Looks like your jobs have reverted back to the ‘ubuntu-not-h2’ label and > > are now awaiting in the queue for a node that > > doesn’t exist. > > > > Please update your jobs using whatever method (job-dsl etc) so your jobs > > can resume building. > > > > See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/ > Jenkins+node+labels > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Jenkins+node+labels> > > for the upto date slimmed down > > label listing. As you’ll see the ‘Hadoop’ label gives you (currently a > > minimum of) 10 nodes and choosing > > (Hadoop||ubuntu) gives you 27 nodes!. > > > > Recap - there is NO YAHOO-NOT-H2 LABEL. It is not needed - H2 is the same > > as any other node. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Gav… (ASF Infra.) > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera // j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
