[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-49?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602333#comment-14602333
]
Sean Busbey commented on BUILDS-49:
-----------------------------------
bq. Well that would be embarrassing. Sounds like an argument to experiment with
isolation via docker/LXC.
The first release of the patch-tester project will have docker isolation for
pre-commit tests. We could see if getting a minimal harness in place to do the
same for nightly builds is doable? It's essentially the same kind of action
just on the set of commits since last run instead of the set of commits from a
jira, right?
> Surefire runner JVMs are being killed for HBase 0.98 Jenkins jobs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BUILDS-49
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-49
> Project: Infra Build Platform
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Jenkins
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Assignee: Andrew Bayer
>
> Occasionally the JVMs executing forked runners from Surefire are being
> killed, failing HBase-0.98 Jenkins jobs.
> For example, see https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/794:
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestCellACLs
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestAccessController
> Killed
> Killed
> {noformat}
> or https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.98/797/
> {noformat}
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestFlushSnapshotFromClient
> Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.snapshot.TestRestoreFlushSnapshotFromClient
> Killed
> Killed
> {noformat}
> Is there something we can do to avoid this?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
