You mean the change Rajiv just made? I'm not sure what that was exactly.

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Giridharan Kesavan
<gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> could you pls fix them in the ansible script, that way
> the configuration is re-producible?
> https://github.com/apache/toolchain/
>
> Let me know if you need help with fixing through ansible..
>
>
> -giri
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tweaking all the slaves to go offline when idle - I'll switch 'em back
>> to normal "always on" once they've all had a chance to
>> disconnect/reconnect.
>>
>> A.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Rajiv Chittajallu <raj...@yahoo-inc.com>
>> wrote:
>> > /etc/security/limits.conf is only used by pam_sessions. Limits are set
>> for
>> > processes, based on this configs, only if an session is initiated via a
>> > process (login/sudo/ssh etc) that uses PAM. Processes started by upstart,
>> > or manually (including root) would only inherit parent limits, what ever
>> > that is, independent of user id.
>> >
>> >
>> > Root (or any caller with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE privs) can update/set limits
>> for
>> > current for spawned children. These doesn¹t read
>> /etc/security/limits.conf
>> > either.
>> >
>> > Current issue was in PAM being disabled in standard ASF configs for SSHD.
>> > So sessions started via sshd, has default limits, inherited from sshd
>> > process. This has been fixed now. Once jenkins slaves are restarted (via
>> > new ssh session), they should get appropriate limits per limits.conf.
>> >
>> > Host reboot is not required to change limits for a process.
>> >
>> > -rajive
>> >
>> > On 10/1/14, 3:21 PM, "Andrew Bayer" <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Root seems to still have that set to 1024 - might be that the way that
>> >>Jenkins is ssh'ing it's inheriting the limits from root or something?
>> >>
>> >>On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Giridharan Kesavan
>> >><gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >>> It¹s set permanently in the limits.conf. But somehow jenkins its not
>> >>> picking it up
>> >>> , even after a reboot.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> jenkins@asf905:~$ hostname -fasf905.gq1.ygridcore.net
>> >>> jenkins@asf905:~$ ulimit -n
>> >>> 60000
>> >>>
>> >>> jenkins@asf905:~$ cat /etc/security/limits.conf | grep nofile
>> >>> #        - nofile - max number of open files
>> >>> jenkins         soft    nofile          60000
>> >>> jenkins         hard    nofile          60000
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> -giri
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 2:10 PM, David Nalley <ke4...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Rajiv:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Can you take a look at BUILDS-17 - we don't seem to be able to change
>> >>>> ulimit on a number of machines at Yahoo!. Or rather, it's not
>> >>>> preserved past reboot it seems.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDS-17
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --David
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> >>>entity to
>> >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> >>>reader
>> >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> >>>that
>> >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> >>>immediately
>> >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> >
>>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.

Reply via email to