Does someone in builds@ have the ability to address this? (restart the jenkins slaves so that the new ulimit limits will take effect)
Thanks! Patrick On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Giri do you mean me? I don't have access to that afaict. > > Patrick > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Giridharan Kesavan > <gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >> jenkins slaves might need a restart. >> >> Could you pls re-launch the slaves from the jenkins UI configuration page? >> >> -giri >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Giri! Unfortunately though it seems to not have taken effect, I >>> just kicked off a precommit build and I see >>> >>> core file size (blocks, -c) 0 >>> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited >>> scheduling priority (-e) 0 >>> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited >>> pending signals (-i) 386178 >>> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 >>> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited >>> open files (-n) 4096 >>> pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8 >>> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 >>> real-time priority (-r) 0 >>> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 >>> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited >>> max user processes (-u) 386178 >>> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited >>> file locks (-x) unlimited >>> >>> more details here: >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/2215/console >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Giridharan Kesavan >>> <gkesa...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > jenkins@asf901:~$ ulimit -a >>> > core file size (blocks, -c) 0 >>> > data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited >>> > scheduling priority (-e) 0 >>> > file size (blocks, -f) unlimited >>> > pending signals (-i) 386178 >>> > max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 >>> > max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited >>> > open files (-n) 60000 >>> > pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8 >>> > POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 >>> > real-time priority (-r) 0 >>> > stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 >>> > cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited >>> > max user processes (-u) 10240 >>> > virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited >>> > file locks (-x) unlimited >>> > >>> > bumped up the open files and max user processes on all the slaves. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -giri >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Giri any chance can you take a look at the ulimit issue on the H# >>> >> machines? All the ZK precommit builds are failing as a result. >>> >> >>> >> I updated the precommit build last night to output "ulimit -a" and it >>> >> says the current limit is 4096, can we bump that up or set the default >>> >> to unlimited? >>> >> >>> >> Thanks! >>> >> >>> >> Patrick >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Rakesh R <rake...@huawei.com> wrote: >>> >> > +1 >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Adding one more point. I could see the following error too in the >>> >> > pre-commit build. >>> >> > >>> >> > [exec] [junit] Exception in thread "CommitProcWorkThread-16" >>> >> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >>> >> > org/apache/zookeeper/server/ConnectionBean >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.registerConnection(ServerCnxnFactory.java:159) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZooKeeperServer.finishSessionInit(ZooKeeperServer.java:594) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.FinalRequestProcessor.processRequest(FinalRequestProcessor.java:198) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.CommitProcessor$CommitWorkRequest.doWork(CommitProcessor.java:295) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > org.apache.zookeeper.server.WorkerService$ScheduledWorkRequest.run(WorkerService.java:161) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > >>> >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918) >>> >> > [exec] [junit] at >>> >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >>> >> > >>> >> > -Rakesh >>> >> > >>> >> > -----Original Message----- >>> >> > From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunque...@yahoo.com.INVALID] >>> >> > Sent: 21 July 2014 02:19 >>> >> > To: d...@zookeeper.apache.org >>> >> > Cc: Andrew Bayer; builds@apache.org; Giridharan Kesavan >>> >> > Subject: Re: ulimit changed with Apache Jenkins upgrade? >>> >> > >>> >> > +1 >>> >> > >>> >> > On 18 Jul 2014, at 18:59, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> Hi builds folks, is this a system wide issue or something we should >>> >> >> address ourselves? Thanks! >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Patrick >>> >> >> >>> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> >> >> From: Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >>> >> >> Date: Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:38 AM >>> >> >> Subject: ulimit changed with Apache Jenkins upgrade? >>> >> >> To: Giridharan Kesavan <gkesa...@hortonworks.com> >>> >> >> Cc: DevZooKeeper <d...@zookeeper.apache.org>, Andrew Bayer >>> >> >> <and...@cloudera.com> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Hi Giri, can you check that the new hosts (H#) have the ulimit set >>> >> >> to >>> >> >> what it was set to on the original hadoop# hosts? I'm seeing new >>> >> >> test >>> >> >> failures with >>> >> >> >>> >> >> [exec] [junit] java.io.FileNotFoundException: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-Build/trunk/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> build/test/tmp/test7610638215300246179.junit.dir/version-2/log.1000000 >>> >> >> 01 >>> >> >> (Too many open files) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> which we've not seen before. I believe this means that we running >>> >> >> out >>> >> >> of file descriptors? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Can you verify and address if possible? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Thanks, >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Patrick >>> >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >>> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity >>> > to >>> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >>> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the >>> > reader of >>> > this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >>> > any >>> > printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding >>> > of >>> > this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >>> > communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete >>> > it >>> > from your system. Thank You. >> >> >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of >> this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of >> this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it >> from your system. Thank You.