Maybe I've been a bit harsh in my previous emails, but I wasn't blaming anybody, just asking for some attention.
Thanks for looking into it. EdB On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] >> Sent: Sunday, 29 December 2013 9:10 PM >> To: builds@apache.org; Gavin McDonald >> Subject: Re: [windows1] offline >> >> Can you please look at 'windows1', > > Already looking. > >> it has been offline for a couple of days. > > It is also the xmas holidays. > > Gav... > >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Gavin McDonald >> <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote: >> > >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] >> >> Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2013 6:25 PM >> >> To: builds@apache.org >> >> Subject: Re: [windows1] offline >> >> >> >> I'm sorry, but it's been 10 days now and in that time we've seen very >> > little >> >> activity from the 'powers that be'. We've even had to make >> >> substantial changes to our own project to work around the failure of >> >> the slave and now we've implemented that, the slave has been offline > for >> more than a day. >> >> >> >> If someone takes one the responsibility to maintain a machine, and >> >> refuses all help when it's offered, >> > >> > Which help was offered that I refused please? >> > >> >> I don't think it's asking too much if we expect that person to a >> >> least keep that machine (on which a lot of people, not only >> > us, >> >> rely) online. >> > >> > There are over 50 machines that a lot of people rely on. I think I've >> > concentrated on the windows build machines a fair bit these last few >> > days. The windows2 box should really help so that resources can be >> > divided between the two. In case of failure of one for whatever reason >> > then the build should be set to pick the other. >> > >> > This windows2 machine should have more and more added to it over the >> > next few days and I hope that projects will try it (even trigger a >> > manual build) then state what deps are needed. >> > >> > Thanks to you and others for pushing for stability on the builds, we >> > are getting there. >> > >> > I do have to fit a Confluence upgrade in tomorrow so expect delays >> tomorrow. >> > >> > Gav... >> > >> >> >> >> But I get that my opinion is a minority one, so I'll leave this issue >> >> to >> > more >> >> patient souls. >> >> >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > Erik, >> >> > >> >> > Let's try to continue to be patient. It is a weekend, and there is >> >> > a reasonable chance that whatever caused our build to break totally >> >> > broke the server on reboot. >> >> > >> >> > -Alex >> >> > >> >> > On 12/13/13 10:48 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >>Guinness called. It's official, we now have the longest reboot time >> >> >>in recorded history: > 24 hrs ;-) >> >> >> >> >> >>EdB >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> > wrote: >> >> >>> Interesting reboot performance... our builds have been waiting >> >> >>>for >> >> >>>1.5 hrs. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> EdB >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> >> >>> <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Erik de Bruin >> >> >>>><e...@ixsoftware.nl> >> >> >>>>wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> Hi Gavin, >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> As 'windows2' has, as far as i can tell, not been configured to >> >> >>>>> run the Apache Flex builds yet, we are dependant on 'windows1'. >> >> >>>>> And 'windows1' appears to be offline. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Help? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/windows1/ says that it is >> >> >>>> being rebooted; probably because we asked him to ;-) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Thanks, >> >> >>>> Om >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> EdB >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> T. 06-51952295 >> >> >>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> >>> >> >> >>> T. 06-51952295 >> >> >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>-- >> >> >>Ix Multimedia Software >> >> >> >> >> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> >>3521 VB Utrecht >> >> >> >> >> >>T. 06-51952295 >> >> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
