> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.d...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 28 January 2011 8:13 AM > To: builds@apache.org > Subject: Re: Max open files on ubuntu1 > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:33 PM, Gav... <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: michael.d.d...@gmail.com [mailto:michael.d.d...@gmail.com] On > > > Behalf Of Michael Dick > > > Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 5:55 AM > > > To: builds@apache.org > > > Subject: Re: Max open files on ubuntu1 > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Michael Dick <mik...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Niklas Gustavsson > > > <nik...@protocol7.com>wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Michael Dick <mik...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > Was the number of open files changed on ubuntu1 recently? > > > >> > In the past we've solved this by increasing the number of open > > > files > > > >> (4096 > > > >> > in my case). > > > >> > > > >> Should work now, could you please verify? > > > >> > > > >> /niklas > > > >> > > > > > > > > It is working now. > > > > > > > > Thanks very much! > > > > > > > > -mike > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like we're seeing this again on ubuntu1. Could someone take a > > > look? > > > > I fixed it a week ago: > > > > hudson@minerva:~$ ulimit -n > > > > 40000 > > > > (that is the lower limit with 60000 being the higher.) > > > > Gav... > > > Is the limit on ubuntu2 higher? Ubuntu2 is working (same svn revision > of > OpenJPA), but 40000 is way more than we should need. I'm running with > 4096 > locally.
Yeah both Ubuntu1 and Ubuntu2 have identical 40000/60000 open files settings. I'll dig some more when I get time. Gav... > > > -mike
