On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Would we like this to be a specific JDK configuration in Hudson? That >> is, is there a value in having builds running on "un-touched" JDKs by >> default? > > If the question is whether we have any test suites that validate that > a given project runs correctly on a JRE without unlimited strength, > then the answer is no, at least for the builds I'm managing (Axis2 and > WS). Obviously I cannot speak for other projects...
I've added a specific JDK for this purpose: "JDK 1.6 (Unlimited security)". I have also changed back the regular JDK 1.6 to use the vanilla policy JARs. This JDK is available on ubuntu1 and ubuntu2 so you should be able to tie your job to "Ubuntu" and use this JDK. /niklas
