Perhaps there is an in-between here, too. Can't we give access to Hudson itself w/o giving access to the machine? That way, Uwe could run and configure the jobs (which is the most common task) w/o necessarily needing to deal w/ the machine level stuff.
-Grant On Jan 27, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Tim Ellison wrote: > On 27/Jan/2010 11:26, Justin Mason wrote: >> Hi Philip -- >> it's purely because the user accounts on the Hudson machines have >> quite a lot of privileges. > > Anything much more significant than people's privileges via their > people.a.o accounts? > >> Personally I'm open to the idea of making an exception if the AVRO PMC >> call for it, and assuming none of the other Hudson admins are against >> it. > > Not against it, but if there is a flood of new account requests from > committers I'd like to examine whether we can roll those machines into > the existing infra routines. > > Regards, > Tim
