On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Nigel Daley <ni...@apache.org> wrote: > If someone wants to supply a Windows Hudson slave and administer it, I'm > fine with hooking it into the Hudson master (other Hudson admins can voice > their opinion).
Great. I'll be volunteering to install and maintain it. > Sounds like this is to be a buildbot slave -- not sure it's > a good idea for a build slave to have 2 masters. I'm assuming Brett wants it for a Continuum slave. I agree that I can foresee some potential issues with running two different slaves on the same server. However, I think that for now the benefits of having a single server to maintain overweight the potential problems. If we run into real problems (my biggest worries are around resource competition) it would be easy enough to separate the slaves at that time. /niklas
