On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:03:33 GMT, Hannes Wallnöfer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Please review a change to solve a number of issues in the HTML presentation 
> of the JVM Tool Interface specification that prevented it from using 
> JDK-level documentation features such as CSS themes and heading permalinks:
> 
>  - Use wrapped `<section>` elements instead of empty `<p>` elements  for 
> section ids
>  - Use the CSS `light-dark()` function for colors in inline styles to support 
> the dark theme
>  - Resolve a number of unwanted interactions of the inline styles with the 
> `jdk-default.css` stylesheet
>  - Remove the need for hard-coded `<div class="sep"/>` separators by defining 
> proper margins
>  - Move `<hr>` tags between sections and don't use them for section `id` 
> attributes
>  - Solve minor whitespace issue by setting `indent="no"` on `<xsl:output>`
> 
> The rendered `jvmti.html` file as processed by the JDK build script [can be 
> viewed 
> here](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8393263/docs.00/specs/jvmti.html). It 
> now supports light and dark themes, hovering over headings shows a permalink 
> icon, and various rendering problems resulting from interaction with 
> `jdk-default.css` (especially in function/callback tables) have been fixed. 
> The spec is also easier to read on very wide and very small displays.
> 
> The unprocessed version of the spec as generated by the XSL stylesheet [is 
> also available](https://cr.openjdk.org/~hannesw/8393263/raw.00/jvmti.html). 
> It should be visually unchanged from the old version.
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

Thank you for addressing this! Overall, it looks like a very nice fix.
In fact, it is not easy to review. Also, I'm not an expert in the HTML and CSS 
areas.
But the generated `jvmti.html` looks good. So, I approve this change.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33181#pullrequestreview-5454904996

Reply via email to