On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 11:57:35 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Serhiy, my opinion is that we shouldn't be adding this change to every > single test file. When a test is run, typically in CI or locally, it runs as > part of several other tests on a specific host. The > `IPSupport.printPlatformSupport(...)` prints host specific details and not > test specific details, so calling this in every single test would generate > redundant output and would require update and future additions to every > single test within the networking area. > > If this information isn't already captured in the jtreg failure handlers of > the JDK, then I think we should enhance those failure handlers so that this > same information gets collected just once when there is a test failure or a > timeout. That I think should avoid all these test updates. Hi Jaikiran, this output would help during ATR failure analysis, as experience of previous ones shows there are a lot of communication going on during this period on env setup especially in IPv6 testing, so the idea is to save some time for those back and forward communications in clearing out testing environments when 3rd party is involved in testing. Plus it's a background for future changes, that will involve runs with specific JVM option as -Djava.net.PreferIPv6Addresses in IPV6 only and mixed env. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28420#issuecomment-3557840486
