> Building jdk with `--with-extra-cflags='-Wno-incompatible-pointer-types'` 
> triggers 1000+ warning messages like `cc1plus: warning: command-line option 
> ‘-Wno-incompatible-pointer-types’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++`. 
> 
> The root cause is that `JVM_CFLAGS ` which contains both `EXTRA_CXXFLAGS` and 
> `EXTRA_CFLAGS` when compiling `src/hotspot` C++ source files and building 
> `BUILD_LIBJVM`.
> 
> This PR does:
> 1. Not to append `EXTRA_CFLAGS` or `EXTRA_CXXFLAGS` into `JVM_CFLAGS` before 
> calling `SetupJdkLibrary`, instead let `SetupCompilerFlags` accept and merge 
> `EXTRA_CFLAGS` and `EXTRA_CXXFLAGS` passed from `SetupJdkLibrary` as 
> parameters, so CPP compilation will only see `EXTRA_CXXFLAGS` as expected.
> 2. Correct `PCH_COMMAND` to use `EXTRA_CXXFLAGS` as precompiled.hpp.gch 
> should not be compiled with `EXTRA_CFLAGS`.
> 3. Fixed `STATIC_LIB_CFLAGS` in `Flags.gmk` to `-DSTATIC_BUILD=1`, which was 
> missed by 
> [cbab40bc](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/cbab40bce45a2f58906be49c841178fa1dfd457e#diff-ab3ce05e795360030f19402fd0c2fad1dc1f7c5e7acc993cc4a2096cf31ccf40R114-R121)
>  for the refactor of building static libs.
> 
> Tests: Passed jdk building on an AArch64 Linux system and tier1 sanity tests, 
> also passed OpenJDK GHA Sanity Checks.

Patrick Zhang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
commit since the last revision:

  Remove the comments wrt not appending EXTRA_CFLAGS to JVM_CFLAGS
  
  Signed-off-by: Patrick Zhang <patr...@os.amperecomputing.com>

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24115/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24115/files/aa242dd5..5440ddc5

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24115&range=02
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=24115&range=01-02

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 3 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24115.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24115/head:pull/24115

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24115

Reply via email to