On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:19:38 GMT, Joachim Kern <jk...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> After "JDK-8339480: Build static-jdk image with a statically linked >> launcher" AIX was not able to build the new target. Therefore with >> "JDK-8345590 AIX 'make all' fails after JDK-8339480" the new target was >> disabled again. >> >> Now with this change we can enable the statically linked launcher target >> again. >> There are 3 things to do. >> 1. Modify `dladdr()`. Because this API does not exist on AIX it is >> implemented based on the `loadquery()` API. Unfortunately, this API does >> only return the name of the executable, but not its path. Beforehand this >> was no problem, because we asked for a loaded library, for which the API >> provides the path. But now we are asking for the executable itself. >> 2. `dladdr()` is differently implemented three times in the openjdk code. >> In the static case I supressed now the usage of the additional modules >> containing version two and three. I know this shouldn't be the final >> version. Magnus mentioned that they have discussed from time to time to have >> a "basic JDK utility lib" that can be shared between hotspot and the JDK >> libraries. I think this is a good idea for the future, but far beyond the >> scope of this PR. The second best thing Magnus proposed is to only have the >> `dladdr()` functionality in Hotspot and then export it. Let's see how the >> community decides. >> 3. Because we lack a linker flag like `whole-archive`, I had to force the >> export of all symbols by creating export files containing all symbols of the >> static libs. I introduced the new rule for the export file generation as >> "raw" make recipes. Magnus claimed to use the `SetupExecute`. Unfortunately >> I was not able to make it function. So I still have my "raw" solution in >> place, but my last try with `SetupExecute` as comment beneath. Help is >> welcome. > > Joachim Kern has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > follow Martin Looks okay, small nit inside. I would prefer more self explaining variable names like program_full_path , program_base_name but up to you! ------------- Marked as reviewed by mbaesken (Reviewer). PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24062#pullrequestreview-2710649870
