On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:47:31 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This doubt applies to all the tests which exercise lazy values or similar >> logic… without and *with* the security manager. >> >> Now, without the security manager, the problematic cases are no longer >> relevant; the common path *without* the SM remains unchanged and was never >> an issue. >> >> However, a more thorough analysis is required. > > The tests with “Audit Core Reflection” in their summary fall into this > category, we may consider removing them. @prrace Can you please advice on “Audit Core Reflection” category of tests. I'm not 100% sure if these tests need to be deleted or retained (May be some of them are required for code coverage purpose and/or testing code paths that are not covered by existing tests). ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21498#discussion_r1817385564
