> On AIX, we need a static libjli, since the linker cannot find other libraries > (like libjvm.so and libjava.so) using a relative path, as on other platforms. > > However, for reasons unclear, we still build a dynamic libjli.so on AIX, even > though this is never used. Instead, we also build a static libjli_static.a > library (which is then forced to have a different name as to not collide with > the dynamic library). > > This should be fixed. We should build exactly one libjli on all platforms, be > it static or dynamic.
Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Attempted fix for exeJliLaunchTest ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497/files/c6f396d1..0533060c Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18497&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18497&range=00-01 Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18497/head:pull/18497 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497