> On AIX, we need a static libjli, since the linker cannot find other libraries 
> (like libjvm.so and libjava.so) using a relative path, as on other platforms.
> 
> However, for reasons unclear, we still build a dynamic libjli.so on AIX, even 
> though this is never used. Instead, we also build a static libjli_static.a 
> library (which is then forced to have a different name as to not collide with 
> the dynamic library).
> 
> This should be fixed. We should build exactly one libjli on all platforms, be 
> it static or dynamic.

Magnus Ihse Bursie has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
additional commit since the last revision:

  Attempted fix for exeJliLaunchTest

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497/files/c6f396d1..0533060c

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18497&range=01
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=18497&range=00-01

  Stats: 3 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/18497/head:pull/18497

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18497

Reply via email to