On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 04:06:48PM +0200, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 10:58:32PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote: > > imsg_get is on the way out. It was renamed to imsgbuf_get() and the return > > value was simplified. Fixing all of the tree still needs to happen. > > We should either document this or at least we should indicate that its > omissiong isn't an oversight. In libcrypto we add a marker like this: > > Index: imsg_init.3 > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libutil/imsg_init.3,v > diff -u -p -r1.46 imsg_init.3 > --- imsg_init.3 13 Jun 2025 18:34:00 -0000 1.46 > +++ imsg_init.3 21 Jul 2026 21:40:46 -0000 > @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ > .Nm imsgbuf_read , > .Nm imsgbuf_set_maxsize , > .Nm imsgbuf_write > +.\" .Nm imsg_get is intentionally undocumented > +.\" because imsgbuf_get should be used instead. > .Nd IPC messaging functions > .Sh SYNOPSIS > .Lb libutil
Sure. OK claudio@ -- :wq Claudio
