On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 14:06:33 +0100, Florian Obser <flor...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > On 2024-06-23 17:58 +01, Kirill A. Korinsky <kir...@korins.ky> wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2024 16:07:37 +0100, > > Florian Obser <flor...@openbsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> I would argue that it works as intended. I suppose this could be > >> documented better. > >> > >> Only resolving strategies listed in "preference" are considered. > >> > > > > From the current wording in the man page I get that the preference is a list > > of DNS server types used to resolve everything. > > > > Also, I haven't seen any restriction in the force block that type should be > > part of the preference, and in the EXAMPLE block I see that force uses > > autoconf without such a note. > > That works because it uses the default preference list which just lists > all types. > > I think this clarifies it, OK? > > diff --git unwind.conf.5 unwind.conf.5 > index dd64e3e4dd2..35cb7fe1781 100644 > --- unwind.conf.5 > +++ unwind.conf.5 > @@ -130,6 +130,11 @@ Force resolving of > .Ar name > and its subdomains by the given resolver > .Ar type . > +The > +.Ar type > +must be listed in the > +.Ic preference > +list to be used. > If > .Cm accept bogus > is specified, validation is not enforced. >
Yep, that small changes in docs allows to avoid long investigation. Thanks! -- wbr, Kirill
