Klemens Nanni(k...@openbsd.org) on 2023.11.11 20:10:08 +0000: > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 06:00:13PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote: > > I think there is a glitch in pfctl(8). It fails to traverse > > to anchors when it is asked to show tables. however table > > is there if you search for it using hints: > > Yes, that's a pfctl(8) bug, it's '-a' defines recursiveness for tables. > > > > > pf# pfctl -a relayd/myRedirect -sT > > myRedirect > > pf# pfctl -a relayd/myRedirect -t myRedirect -T show > > 199.185.178.80 > > So the table is there, but it is still confusingly named after the > redirection/anchor -- I doubt that's intentional.
I dont know what the original intention was, but i believe its been like this for more than a decade. So people might depend on it even if you think its strange. Lets fix pfctl...
