On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:54:00PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > (gdb) > > > > > > with some instruction I might be able to extract more information. > > > > > > > failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with > > cf-protection=branch, and the compiler has it since few weeks now (since > > 2023-04-26 exactly). > > > > Could you check the signature date of your package ? > > > > $ grep @digital-signature /var/db/pkg/xfce4-session-*/+CONTENTS > > @digital-signature signify2:2023-06-10T10:18:49Z:external > > [Mon Jun 12 16:49:33] peter@zaida:~$ grep @digital-signature > /var/db/pkg/xfce4-session-*/+CONTENTS > @digital-signature signify2:2023-04-16T09:46:52Z:external > > > > > it could be a good indication for the build date. > >
the package is too old. the signature date is 2023-04-16, so it hasn't been built with cf-protection=branch. it is why the kernel kills xfce4-session. as from your first mail you said pkg_add -u was ran, could you double check it ? maybe the mirror used isn't in sync, or the PKG_PATH isn't right (using -stable instead of -current url). thanks. -- Sebastien Marie
