Yep -- it is definately an old binary. > failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with > cf-protection=branch, and the compiler has it since few weeks now (since > 2023-04-26 exactly). > > Could you check the signature date of your package ? > > $ grep @digital-signature /var/db/pkg/xfce4-session-*/+CONTENTS > @digital-signature signify2:2023-06-10T10:18:49Z:external > > it could be a good indication for the build date. > > > In gdb, could you get the 'disassemble' output (beware, it could be long) ? I > am > interested to the current instructions (to ensure that it is failing in a > jmp). > It could permit to check that the backtrace is right. > > Thanks. > -- > Sebastien Marie >
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce4 session dies immedia... Sebastien Marie
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce4 session dies im... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce4 session die... Sebastien Marie
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce4 session... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce4 ses... Sebastien Marie
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce... Theo de Raadt
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot xfce... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot ... Stuart Henderson
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snapshot ... Theo de Raadt
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snaps... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snaps... Stuart Henderson
- Re: On 2013-06-12 snaps... Theo de Raadt
- Another data point for ... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: IBT - hexchat (luaj... Sebastien Marie
- Re: IBT - hexchat (luaj... Peter N. M. Hansteen
- Re: IBT - hexchat (luaj... Sebastien Marie