I don't see the point.

If you get asked the question, and you know the answer, you answer it.
Why is that not the end of the story?


cho...@jtan.com wrote:

> Ingo Schwarze writes:
> > I see nothing wrong with it.  It is easier to describe in the manual
> 
> Indeed I was not suggesting that there was something wrong; being asked for a 
> password when doing something which root could implicitly do simply confused 
> me for a moment which prompted figuring out what the situation was.
> 
> > The bikeshed has already been painted, and no matter whether you are
> > justified in calling the colour that tedu@ chose "pink", i wouldn't
> > see an obvious benefit in re-painting it now.
> 
> I have no desire to change this behaviour or engage in bike-shedding. Please 
> no. Perhaps instead 5 free lines?
> 
> --- doas.1.~1.19.~      Sun Sep  4 18:20:37 2016
> +++ doas.1      Thu Jul  4 01:26:21 2019
> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@
>  Execute the command as
>  .Ar user .
>  The default is root.
> +.Sh NOTE
> +Although the kernel imposes no restrictions on the root user's ability
> +to pose as any other user,
> +.Nm
> +will always require a password as per its configuration in order to
> +keep unnecessary complications out of a critical security utility.
>  .El
>  .Sh EXIT STATUS
>  .Ex -std doas
> 
> Not necessary of course but would have been nice for my peace of mind the 
> other day when it happened (ie. to know that the situation has been duly 
> considered). btw. I've never done anything with mdoc before so I expect 
> there's a better macro to use to head this than .Sh but that's really not the 
> point.
> 
> > Please do not cross-post between different OpenBSD lists.
> 
> Apologies and understood.
> 
> Matthew
> 

Reply via email to