On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:15:43PM -0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > On 10/02/19(Sun) 20:46, Artturi Alm wrote: > > Hi, > > > > rather than patching uhub(4), i figured this would be less not-ok, > > if not ok as-is, given its way more limited scope. > > Why shouldn't we patch uhub(4)? >
There's no MD code in uhub(4), and i don't know what to fix there yet, but the workaround i was referring to w/"patching" has MI side-effects. > > diff below works for me, but i suppose playing w/timeouts is a must, > > for root on nfs? > > What is the issue? Could you explain it in words? That would allow > us to find a solution together :o) > I thought this was known, i'm sorry; i should have linked to the details[0]. -Artturi [0] https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=154408887807578&w=2
