On 7.12.2017. 13:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 30/11/17(Thu) 12:49, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> On 29.11.2017. 18:25, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> sending ip6 traffic from host connected to vlan200 on ix0 to host
>>> connected to vlan300 on ix1 and running
>>>
>>> ifconfig vlan200 destroy
>>> ifconfig ix0 down
>>> sh netstart vlan200
>>> sh netstart ix0
>>> ifconfing vlan300 destroy
>>> ifconfig ix1 down
>>> sh netstart vlan300
>>> sh netstart ix1
>>> sh netstart
>>
>>
>> while trying to repeat panic, i got a new one:
> 
> Without the trace of the 'ifconfig' process it's hard to know where is
> the race.  See the output of "ps /o":
> 
>> Stopped at      db_enter+0x5:   popq    %rbp
>>     TID    PID    UID     PRFLAGS     PFLAGS  CPU  COMMAND
>>   58285  46948      0         0x3          0    2  ifconfig
>> * 20256  49787      0     0x14000 0x40000200    0  softclock
> 
> Make sure to include the trace of the two active processes.  Since CPU0
> entered DDB you already reported the 'softclock' one.  To get the
> 'ifconfig' one, type the following next time:
> 
> ddb{0}> tr /up 0t58285
> 
> Here '58285' is the TID (Thread ID) of the process.
> 
> Same thing for the em(4) panic you reported before.  I made an educated
> guess about which race can occur.   But having the trace of all active
> processes help a lot!
> 
> Thanks for you great reports,
> Martin
> 

yes yes, you are right, sorry for lousy reports.
i'm hitting box with rhythm stick right now; Das ist gut! C'est fantastique!

i hope that it will panic today .. :)

Reply via email to